S'abonner

Qualitative Analysis of Effective Lecture Strategies in Emergency Medicine - 19/10/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.011 
Chad S. Kessler, MD, MHPE a, b, , Sanjay Dharmapuri, MA c, Evie G. Marcolini, MD d
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Hospital, Chicago, IL 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL 
c College of Medicine, University of Illinois–Chicago, Chicago, IL 
d Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 

Address for correspondence: Chad S. Kessler, MD, MHPE

Résumé

Study objective

We empirically identify those aspects that make an effective lecture according to both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the opinions of a select group of emergency medicine educators.

Methods

The authors worked collaboratively with the Educational Meetings Committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) to distribute surveys to 150 participants identified as exemplary lecturers in emergency medicine. These participants had been rated in the top 10% of all lecturers by ACEP's Educational Meetings Committee, according to audience evaluations. Respondents quantitatively rated the importance of a set of strategies for the design/organization and delivery of a lecture. Additional qualitative responses were elicited from semistructured, open-ended questions that were used to identify conceptual themes and subcategories of major themes.

Results

One hundred fifty surveys were sent. Seventy-four (49%) of the surveys were returned, of which 67 (45%) were analyzed. Quantitative results revealed the top 3 categories of importance about design/organization (having a manageable scope of content for the allotted time, having clear objectives, and using case-based scenarios) and the top 3 categories of importance about delivery (knowledge of slides/material, having passion/enthusiasm, and interaction with the audience). Qualitative results revealed 5 thematic concepts from the analysis of 281 statements: delivery, vehicle, content, preparation, and uncontrollables, in order of descending importance according to our results. Under the category “delivery,” the subcategory “engaging” was the most frequently endorsed quality. “Relevance,” under the category “content,” was the second most endorsed quality of all the statements obtained.

Conclusion

Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that a specific and directed structure, a lecturer's knowledge base, and confidence and enthusiasm for the material are key components in the development of an effective lecture. These self-reported findings help describe strategies of exemplary emergency medicine lecturers that can be considered by faculty, residents, and other presenters.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 483 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Provide process.asp?qs_id=7093 on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Supervising editor: Peter C. Wyer, MD
 Author contributions: CSK conceived the study, designed the trial and the survey, and distributed the survey with help from the ACEP Educational Meetings Committee. CSK and SD collected and interpreted the data with statistical support and drafted the article. CSK takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
 Publication date: Available online August 5, 2011.


© 2011  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 58 - N° 5

P. 482 - novembre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Improving Outcomes of Elderly Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
  • Mark Rosenberg, Lynne Rosenberg
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • I'm an Emergency Medicine Resident with a Special Interest in Ultrasonography: Should I Take a Certification Examination?
  • Kamal Medlej, Resa Lewiss

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.