S'abonner

Early Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Among Elderly Patients Admitted Through Emergency Departments: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis - 19/10/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.04.033 
Ba' Pham, MSc, PhD (c) a, , Laura Teague, RN-EC, MN b, James Mahoney, MD c, Laurie Goodman, RN, MHScN d, Mike Paulden, MSc, MA(Cantab) a, Jeff Poss, PhD e, Jianli Li, PhD f, Luciano Ieraci, MSc a, Steven Carcone, MSc a, Murray Krahn, MD, MSc a
a Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
b Wound Care Program, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada 
c Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada 
d Skin and Wound Care, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada 
e Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 
f Decision Support Services, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 

Address for correspondence: Ba' Pham, MSc, PhD (c)

Résumé

Study objective

Every year, approximately 6.2 million hospital admissions through emergency departments (ED) involve elderly patients who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pressure-redistribution foam mattresses on ED stretchers and beds for early prevention of pressure ulcers in elderly admitted ED patients.

Methods

Using a Markov model, we evaluated the incremental effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-days) and incremental cost (hospital and home care costs) between early prevention and current practice (with standard hospital mattresses) from a health care payer perspective during a 1-year time horizon.

Results

The projected incidence of ED-acquired pressure ulcers was 1.90% with current practice and 1.48% with early prevention, corresponding to a number needed to treat of 238 patients. The average upgrading cost from standard to pressure-redistribution mattresses was $0.30 per patient. Compared with current practice, early prevention was more effective, with 0.0015 quality-adjusted life-days gained, and less costly, with a mean cost saving of $32 per patient. If decisionmakers are willing to pay $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, early prevention was cost-effective even for short ED stay (ie, 1 hour), low hospital-acquired pressure ulcer risk (1% prevalence), and high unit price of pressure-redistribution mattresses ($3,775). Taking input uncertainty into account, early prevention was 81% likely to be cost-effective. Expected value-of-information estimates supported additional randomized controlled trials of pressure-redistribution mattresses to eliminate the remaining decision uncertainty.

Conclusion

The economic evidence supports early prevention with pressure-redistribution foam mattresses in the ED. Early prevention is likely to improve health for elderly patients and save hospital costs.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.ICJME.org). Funding for this study was provided in part by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to the Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative. The THETA Collaborative provides technology assessment support for the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee and the Medical Advisory Secretariat at the Ministry.
 Please see page 469 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 Provide process.asp?qs_id=7093 on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Supervising editor: Melissa L. McCarthy, ScD
 Author contributions: LT, JM, LG, and MK conceived the study. BP, LT, JP, JL, LG, LI, and SC collected input data to the cost-effectiveness analysis. JP, JL, LI, and SC conducted analyses of costing data. BP, LI, SC, and MK developed the natural history model and conducted the cost-effectiveness analysis. BP, MP, and MK drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. BP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Publication date: Available online August 5, 2011.


© 2011  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 58 - N° 5

P. 468 - novembre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The Hunting of the Snark, 2011
  • Robert L. Wears
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Improving Outcomes of Elderly Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
  • Mark Rosenberg, Lynne Rosenberg

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.