The modified biophysical profile: Antepartum testing in the 1990s - 11/09/11
Abstract |
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the false-negative and false-positive rates of antepartum testing by use of the modified biophysical profile. STUDY DESIGN: From Jan. 1, 1990, through Dec. 31, 1994, antepartum testing results were gathered prospectively and tabulated monthly. For 1 year, 1991, detailed intrapartum and neonatal data were collected from all women admitted and delivered as a result of an abnormal antepartum test result. RESULTS: The false-negative rate of the antepartum testing protocol was 0.8 per 1000 women tested. Sixty percent of those delivered because of an abnormal antepartum test had no evidence of short-term or long-term fetal compromise. False-positive test results led to preterm delivery in 1.5% of those tested before term. CONCLUSION: The false-negative rate of the modified biophysical profile is lower than that of the nonstress test and compares favorably with the false-negative rates of the contraction stress test and the complete biophysical profile. Iatrogenic prematurity resulting from intervention for false-positive test results occurred in 1.5% of women tested before 37 weeks. (AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1996;174:812-7.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Antepartum testing, modified biophysical profile, false-negative rate, false-positive rate
Plan
From the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Women's and Children's Hospital. |
|
Reprint requests: David A. Miller, MD, LAC + USC Women's and Children's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Room 5K-40, 1240 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, CA 90033. |
|
0002-9378/96 $5.00 + 0 6/1/68369 |
Vol 174 - N° 3
P. 812-817 - mars 1996 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?