S'abonner

SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ELEVATION IN THE POST–RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATIENT - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70344-X 
S. Bruce Malkowicz, MD *

Résumé

Radical prostatectomy is one of the most effective methods of treating localized prostate cancer in men under the age of 70, yet the maturation of multiple large surgical series demonstrates that surgical failure represented by a postsurgical serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation is not uncommon. An overall actuarial failure rate of 22%, defined by serum PSA elevation, was recently reported for a very representative series of approximately 1000 men.10 The Mayo Clinic series reported 10-year and 15-year actuarial serum PSA progression of 48% and 60%.64 Another large series of 600 patients displayed a 5-year and 10-year PSA disease-free rate of 69% and 47% overall.58 When only patients treated after 1986 were analyzed, however, the 5-year disease-free rate measured by only serum PSA was 93%. Similarly, the review of the Johns Hopkins series of T1 and T2 patients showed a 5-year PSA-only recurrence of 13%. Clinical local recurrence at 5 years was 3% and distant recurrence in that time period was 5%.44 These data suggest that 10% to 40% of men who undergo a radical prostatectomy for control of localized disease will develop a detectable PSA level over 5 years.21, 36, 45, 54 Refinements in preoperative patient selection will undoubtedly tighten this range to its lower limits, yet contemporarily a significant amount of patients will still fail surgical therapy and one of the most common signs of treatment failure will not be a change in the digital rectal examination (DRE) or an imaging test, but rather a rising serum PSA.

Tumor progression rarely occurs in the absence of an elevated serum PSA.38, 55 A rising serum PSA after surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer presents a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma that does not lend itself to routine treatment decisions. Most of the clinical data pertinent to the treatment of postprostatectomy elevations must be extrapolated from earlier studies involving the treatment of gross positive surgical margins. Some of this data may not be entirely appropriate for decision making in the contemporary setting because recent refinements in preoperative evaluation of patients select a population of postsurgical patients less likely to have gross positive margins or occult spread to regional lymph nodes. Additionally, the majority of studies related to the treatment of elevated postsurgical serum PSA describe the clinical outcome of a fairly small number of patients.

Data regarding androgen ablation therapy in patients with a postprostatectomy rise in serum PSA are similarly extrapolated from studies of patients with advanced metastatic disease. There are no data to prove or refute the value of androgen ablation therapy in patients with a postoperative rise in serum PSA. Such treatment may be costly and the long-term sequellae of different forms of androgen ablation unknown.

The positive effect of any therapy must be balanced against the potential side effects and true potential for having a beneficial impact. This article reviews the definition of an elevated post–radical prostatectomy serum PSA, the assessment of local or distant recurrence, and treatment recommendations based on current data.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Address reprint requests to S. Bruce Malkowicz, MD, Division of Urology, 1 Rhoads Pavilion, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104


© 1996  W. B. Saunders Company. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 4

P. 665-675 - novembre 1996 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
  • Jonathan I. Epstein
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR LOCALIZED RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY
  • David A. Corral, Louis L. Pisters, Andrew C. von Eschenbach

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.