S'abonner

THE ROLE OF THE REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAY FOR PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE SELECTION OF PATIENTS FOR RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70334-7 
Aaron E. Katz, MD *, Glen M. de Vries, BS *, Mitchell C. Benson, MD *, Ralph E. Buttyan, PhD *, Kathleen O'Toole, MD *, Mark A. Rubin, MD *, Michael Stifelman, MD *, Carl A. Olsson, MD *

Résumé

The management and treatment of prostate cancer in 1996 is dependent on several factors. When the clinician has determined that a patient has prostate cancer, the initial evaluation includes a series of diagnostic tests to determine the extent of the disease. Traditionally, ultrasonography, CT scan, bone scan, and endorectal coil MR imaging have been used to stage patients with prostate cancer.11, 33, 34 If the cancer is organ-confined, radical retropubic prostatectomy has been the shown to result in effective disease-free status in the long term.3041 Unfortunately, almost half of all patients initially considered to have clinically localized disease at the time of diagnosis are found to be pathologically upstaged after radical surgery.25 The inability of the urologist to determine the extent of the cancer preoperatively is based on the low sensitivity of the available imaging modalities in detecting microscopic extension of tumor beyond the prostatic capsule.

Recently, we developed an assay that uses reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology that allows us to detect small numbers of cells expressing prostate-specific antigen (PSA), even when extensively diluted in a population of non–PSA-expressing cells.16 When this assay was peripheral blood obtained from untreated patients with confirmed metastatic prostate cancer, it was positive in 89% of the cases. In striking contrast, when this assay was applied to bloods from a large number of control patients without prostate cancer, it was never found to be positive. These results imply that the majority of metastatic prostate cancer patients shed prostate cells into the blood stream. We then theorized that this assay might be useful in identifying patients with extracapsular prostate cancer at earlier stages. As a test of this hypothesis, the assay was applied to a cohort of 94 patients.15 All were candidates for radical prostate surgery based on available diagnostic testing modalities that predicted prostate cancer localized to the prostate gland. The results of this survey supported the use of the RT-PCR for PSA test for detecting patients with early extraprostatic spread of prostate cancer. In this group of patients, a positive test correlated significantly with surgical pathology reports identifying that tumor had spread beyond the prostatic capsule.

An extension of the original study of radical prostatectomy patients, now with 160 subjects, is presented here. Comparison between preoperative RT-PCR results, surgical pathology, and postoperative serum PSA progression demonstrates the potential roles that RT-PCR for PSA may play in the selection of treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Additionally, the biologic significance of the RT-PCR–detected cells in the circulation is discussed and the potential future directions for RT-PCR technology in the staging of prostate and other cancers are examined.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Address reprint requests to Aaron E. Katz, MD, Columbia University, Atchley Pavilion, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10032
Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, CA58089 (REB) and CA13696 (MCB); from the Koch Foundation (CAO); and from the T.J. Martell Foundation (MCB)


© 1996  W. B. Saunders Company. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 4

P. 541-549 - novembre 1996 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND FREE/TOTAL PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
  • Alan W. Partin, H. Ballentine Carter
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • DEFINING THE ROLE OF SURVEILLANCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
  • Jeffrey S. Palmer, Gerald W. Chodak

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.