S'abonner

Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70307-X 
Eli O. Meltzer, MDa, John M. Weiler, MDb, Michael D. Widlitz, MDc
San Diego, Calif., Iowa City, Iowa, and New York, N.Y 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine, a new once-daily highly specific H1-antagonist, has been shown in conventional studies to be efficacious in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy, duration and onset of action, and safety of cetirizine, 10 mg once daily, was compared with that of loratadine, 10 mg once daily, and placebo in a field study of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, double-dummy study conducted over 2 days in spring allergy season at outdoor parks in San Diego and Iowa City. Study medication was administered at 10:00 AM on both days. After screening, eligible patients completed rhinitis symptom diaries in the park hourly from 7:30 to 9:30 AM (baseline); at 10:30 AM and hourly from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period I); at 6:00, 8:00, and 10:00 PM at home (period II); and the next day in the park hourly from 8:00 to 10:00 AM (period III), and from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period IV). Major and total symptom complex scores, global efficacy and overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 279 patients (140 men and 139 women; mean age, 29 years) randomized to treatment, 278 were included in the efficacy analysis. Cetirizine produced significantly greater mean reductions than loratadine or placebo in major symptom complex severity scores at all periods (p ≤ 0.05), except period I for placebo. Cetirizine also produced mean reductions in total symptom complex severity scores that were superior to loratadine at every evaluation period (p < 0.05) and were statistically different from placebo at period II (p < 0.01). A rapid onset of action was observed with cetirizine, as was a better response pattern in the patient global assessment of efficacy compared with loratadine. Study medications were well tolerated; no patient stopped treatment because of side effects. The incidence of somnolence with cetirizine was 13% versus 2% with placebo (p < 0.05); headache occurred more frequently with loratadine (23%) than with cetirizine (11%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Cetirizine relieved rhinitis symptoms more effectively and quickly than loratadine and placebo in this field study of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both active agents were generally well tolerated. (J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL 1996;97:617-26.)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Allergic rhinitis, cetirizine, park study, loratadine, placebo, seasonal allergic rhinitis

Abbreviations : MSC:, TSC:


Plan


 From athe Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, San Diego; bthe College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City; and cU.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc., New York.
 Supported by U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, Pfizer Inc.
 Reprint requests: Eli O. Meltzer, MD, Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, 9610 Granite Ridge Dr., Suite B, San Diego, CA 92123.
 0091-6749/96 $5.00 + 0 1/1/66389


© 1996  Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 97 - N° 2

P. 617-626 - février 1996 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Detection of prognostic factors for oral allergy syndrome in patients with birch pollen hypersensitivity
  • Riccardo Asero, Franco Massironi, Claudio Velati
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Parietaria judaica–specific T-cell clones from atopic patients: Heterogeneity in restriction, Vβ usage, and cytokine profile
  • Federica Sallustoa, Silvia Corintia, Carlo Pinia, Marina M. Bioccab, Guglielmo Brunob, Gabriella Di Felicea

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.