More than 40 years have passed since Goodwin et al<sup>44 Goodwin W.E., Casey W.C., Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis JAMA 1955 ;  157 : 891-894

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références</sup> reported on “percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis.” After a period of relative neglect, interest in the technique was rekindled with reports of the successful creation of large-bore nephrostomy tracts for percutaneous stone extraction.<sup>82 Lee W.J., Smith A.D., Cubelli V. , et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of 500 consecutive cases Urologic Radiology 1986 ;  8 : 61-66  [cross-ref]

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 84 LeRoy A.J., May G.R., Bender C.E. , et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy for stone removal Radiology 1984 ;  151 : 607-612

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 110 Segura J.W., Patterson D.E., LeRoy A.J. , et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: Review of 1,000 cases J Urol 1985 ;  134 : 1077-1081

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références</sup> As the team of urologist and interventional radiologist gained experience, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL) became the primary method of treatment for stones of the upper urinary tract, and the performance of percutaneous renal entry became an almost daily occurrence in most large medical centers. The field of interventional uroradiology was born.

Approval by the Food and Drug Administration of the first device for the performance of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in 1984 led to rapid substitution of ESWL for PNL as the primary mode of treatment for most upper urinary tract stones. As experience was gained with ESWL, limitations of the technique were defined. It was recognized that percutaneous techniques were still necessary as primary or supplemental therapy in some patients. The experience previously gained with percutaneous techniques, coupled with technologic advances in instrumentation, continued to broaden the indications for performance of percutaneous renal entry<sup>12 Banner M.P., Ramchandani P., Pollack H.M. Interventional procedures in the upper urinary tract Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991 ;  14 : 267-284  [cross-ref]

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 35 Dunnick N.R., Illescas F.F., Mitchell S. , et al. Interventional uroradiology Invest Radiol 1989 ;  24 : 831-841  [cross-ref]

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références, 105 Rickards D., Jones S.N. Percutaneous interventional uroradiology Br J Radiol 1989 ;  62 : 573-581  [cross-ref]

Cliquez ici pour aller à la section Références</sup>:

At the authors' institution, which is a center for treatment of stone disease, the authors average four to six new renal entries per week, about half of which are performed for complex urinary tract stones. Urinary diversion for obstruction not related to stones accounts for about one third of the entries. Also included are many unique problems that can be managed with percutaneous techniques but in the past frequently required major surgical intervention. Familiarity with basic entry techniques allows the application of interventional uroradiologic procedures to the transplant kidney and to the bladder. Applying new technologies, such as metallic stents, to difficult management problems also appears promising.