Accuracy of echocardiography for detection of aortic arch obstruction after stage I Norwood procedure - 09/09/11
Abstract |
Background Echocardiography has been widely used in postoperative assessment after stage I Norwood procedure, but its accuracy in detecting aortic arch obstruction (AAO) has not been determined. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of echocardiography in the diagnosis of AAO after stage I Norwood procedure, identify echocardiographic predictors of arch obstruction, and examine the time course of its development. Methods The records and echocardiography reports of 139 patients who survived stage I Norwood procedure were reviewed. Reference standard for the diagnosis of AAO was catheterization, surgery, or autopsy. Results AAO was diagnosed by reference standard criteria in 31 (22%) patients. Echocardiography correctly diagnosed AAO in 19 patients, missed the diagnosis in five, and wrongly predicted AAO in eight, yielding a 73% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 70% positive predictive value, and 88% accuracy. Moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction, moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation, and an abnormal abdominal aortic Doppler flow pattern were more common in patients with AAO. The probability of AAO developing within 6 months after stage I Norwood procedure was 21.1%, with a very small likelihood after that point. Beyond the first 30 days after surgery, the risk of death was higher in patients in whom AAO developed compared with those in whom it did not (relative risk 5.9, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 13.2). Conclusions Echocardiography is a highly specific modality in detecting AAO after stage I Norwood procedure but its sensitivity is limited. Because of the increased risk of death associated with AAO and because most obstructions develop between 1 and 6 months postoperatively, early cardiac catheterization with possible intervention should be considered in patients with moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction, moderate or sever tricuspid regurgitation, or an abnormal abdominal Doppler flow pattern during that period. (Am Heart J 1998;135:230-6.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
From the Departments of aCardiology and bCardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery, Harvard Medical School. |
|
*Supported by the Association Pour le Development des Reserches Biologiques et Medicales au C.H.R. de Marseille. |
|
†Supported by the Kobren Fund. |
|
Reprint requests: Tal Geva, MD, Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E mail: geva–t@a1.tch.harvard.edu |
|
♢ | 4/1/87273 |
Vol 135 - N° 2
P. 230-236 - février 1998 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?