Differential plasma endothelin levels in subgroups of patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries - 09/09/11
Abstract |
Background Raised plasma endothelin concentrations have previously been reported in patients with cardiac syndrome X, but it is not known whether these levels vary between clinically distinct subgroups in this heterogeneous condition.
Methods and Results We compared plasma immunoreactive endothelin levels in 54 patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms and 21 healthy control subjects. The patient group was divided into 4 clinically distinct subgroups: 7 with left bundle branch block (group A); 7 with previous myocardial infarction (group B); 24 with positive exercise electrocardiography (group C); and 16 with negative exercise electrocardiography (group D). The plasma endothelin concentration was significantly higher in patients compared with control subjects (3.7 [2.9 to 4.3] vs 2.96 [2.4 to 3.4] pg/mL, respectively, median [interquartile range]; P = 0.002). Endothelin concentrations were most significantly elevated in group A and group B (4.5 [3.6 to 5.2] pg/mL; P = 0.005 and 4.1 [3.9 to 4.5] pg/mL;P = 0.001, respectively). Plasma endothelin concentrations were also significantly elevated in group C (3.7 [2.8 to 4.1] pg/mL; P = 0.02) but not in group D (3.0 [2.5 to 3.8] pg/mL; P = 0.3).
Conclusions Plasma endothelin concentration is elevated in patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries, particularly those with left bundle branch block or previous myocardial infarction. (Am Heart J 1998;136:412-7.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George’s Hospital Medical School. |
|
Supported by Fellowship Grants from the British Heart Foundation. |
|
Reprint requests: Dr. Juan Carlos Kaski, MD, FESC, FACC, Coronary Artery Disease Research Group, Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, United Kingdom. |
|
4/1/89904 |
Vol 136 - N° 3
P. 412-417 - septembre 1998 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?