S'abonner

Randomized, controlled trial of RheothRx (poloxamer 188) in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction - 09/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70037-7 
Charles Maynard, PhDa, Robert Swenson, MDb, Joseph A. Paris, MDc, Jenny S. Martin, RNa, Alfred P. Hallstrom, PhDd, Manuel D. Cerqueira, MDe, W.Douglas Weaver, MDf

For the RheothRx in Myocardial Infarction Study Group

Seattle and Vancouver, Wash.; Buffalo, N.Y.; Washington, D.C.; and Detroit, Mich 

Abstract

Background: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are not eligible for thrombolytic therapy or primary coronary angioplasty are distinguished by advanced age, complicated medical histories, relatively frequent use of prior revascularization procedures, and worse outcomes than their counterparts who are eligible for reperfusion therapy. Methods and Results: The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial was to determine whether RheothRx, a hemorheologic agent, reduced myocardial infarct size and improved left ventricular function in patients who had suspected AMI at the time of hospital admission and were not eligible for reperfusion therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to RheothRx (n = 97) or placebo (n = 99). Patients in the two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, medical history, and clinical presentation. Enzyme evidence of AMI was present in 69% of the treatment group and 70% of the placebo group. Infarct size measured before hospital discharge was similar in the two groups (14.1% ± 18.5% vs 11.7% ± 14.1%, p = 0.60), although left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in the treatment group (47 ± 14 vs 52 ± 11, p = 0.026). Hospital mortality rate was 11.3% and 7.1% in patients receiving RheothRx and patients receiving placebo, respectively (p = 0.30). There was a higher occurrence of acute renal dysfunction in the RheothRx group (12% vs 2%, p = 0.005). Because of changes in drug dosage necessitated by the occurrence of acute renal dysfunction, the trial was stopped. Conclusions: In this study of patients who had suspected AMI and were not eligible for thrombolytic therapy, RheothRx did not decrease infarct size or favorably alter outcome. The need for effective treatment for this large patient population remains largely unmet. (Am Heart J 1998;135:797-804.)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 From athe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine; bSouthwest Washington Medical Center; cthe Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo; dthe Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine; ethe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Georgetown University School of Medicine; and fHeart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Health System.
☆☆ Supported in part by a research grant from Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C.
 Reprint requests: Charles Maynard, PhD, MITI Coordinating Center, 1910 Fairview Ave., East #204, Seattle, WA 98102.
★★ 4/1/88292


© 1998  Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 135 - N° 5

P. 797-804 - mai 1998 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Early assessment and in-hospital management of patients with acute myocardial infarction at increased risk for adverse outcomes: A nationwide perspective of current clinical practice
  • Richard C. Becker, Maureen Burns, Joel M. Gore, Frederick A. Spencer, Steven P. Ball, William French, Costas Lambrew, Laura Bowlby, Joseph Hilbe, William J. Rogers, For The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2) Participants
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Admission clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics predicting an increased risk for early reinfarction after thrombolytic therapy
  • Yochai Birnbaum, Izhak Herz, Samuel Sclarovsky, Bruria Zlotikamien, Angela Chetrit, Liraz Olmer, Gabriel I. Barbash

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.