S'abonner

Racial Differences in the Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy in a Community-based Sample of the Elderly - 09/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00080-1 
Harvey Jay Cohen, MD a, , Jeffrey Crawford, MD a, Murali K Rao, MD a, Carl F Pieper, DrPH a, Mark S Currie, MD a
a Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University Medical Center, and the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to Harvey Jay Cohen, MD, Box 3003, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if there is an increased prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy in elderly blacks compared with whites, analogous to the difference in incidence of multiple myeloma reported for the two racial groups and to confirm age and gender relationships.

Patients and methods: Subjects were from the Duke Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly, selected on the basis of stratified random household sampling. Blacks were oversampled to allow for increased statistical precision in racial comparisons. In all, 1,732 subjects (aged >70 years) consented to blood drawing and constitute the sample for this study. Monoclonal immunoglobulins were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and immunofixation.

Results: One hundred six subjects (6.1%) had a monoclonal gammopathy. There was a greater than twofold difference in prevalence between blacks (8.4%) and whites (3.8%) (P <0.001); monoclonal gammopathy prevalence increased with age, and was greater in men than women. Those with monoclonal gammopathy did not differ from those without in socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, or education. The presence of monoclonal gammopathy was not associated with any specific diseases nor with impaired functional status. There was a slight increase in serum creatinine levels and decrease in hemoglobin and albumin levels in patients with monoclonal gammopathy, but no difference in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Moreover, IL-6 levels were not correlated significantly with the level of monoclonal protein.

Conclusion: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy is significantly greater among blacks than whites in a community-based sample, in approximately the same ratio that multiple myeloma has been reported in the two groups. Given the absence of correlation with environmental factors, there may be a biological racial difference in susceptibility to an early event in the carcinogenic process leading to multiple myeloma.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly, AG-12102; also supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers, AG-11268, and National Cancer Institute Grant CA-14236.


© 1998  Excerpta Medica Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 104 - N° 5

P. 439-444 - mai 1998 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effects of Treatment with Formoterol on Bronchoprotection against Methacholine
  • Brian Lipworth, Soong Tan ChB, Martin Devlin, Trevor Aiken ChB, Rachel Baker, David Hendrick
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Remnant-like Particle Cholesterol Levels in Patients with Dysbetalipoproteinemia or Coronary Artery Disease
  • Sridevi Devaraj, Gloria Vega, Rick Lange, Scott M Grundy, Ishwarlal Jialal

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.