S'abonner

REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES IN VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEEN IN EMERGENCY SETTINGS - 08/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70089-4 
Julia B. Frank, MD, Maria F. Rodowski, MD
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 

Résumé

The Pentagon's policy on homosexuality vividly captures the attitude of many emergency department (ED) professionals toward the underlying situational, psychological, and behavioral problems of victims of domestic violence.41, 64, 74, 126 Screening to identify victims of violence has become a part of some, though by no means all1, 28, 34, 45, 92, 101 emergency services, partly in response to federal initiatives, state mandates, and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHCO) standards.40, 72, 91, 98, 100 Nevertheless, except for careful documentation of history and injuries, ED clinicians often think they have little to offer someone with an immediate or recent history of assault by an intimate associate. Without readily available, effective interventions, it becomes difficult even to maintain screening protocols and standards of documentation over time.52, 64, 87, 103, 136 Some advocates and social scientists consider the medical response to battered women so inadequate that it appears among the factors that perpetuate rather than mitigate abuse.49, 120, 137

Certainly, room exists for improvement,135 especially in the emergency treatment of battered women. The ED is paradoxically the best and the worst setting for intervention with victims of domestic violence. Its deficiencies are obvious. Treatment is highly focused and moves at a fast pace. The technical resources of the ED do not match the social and psychological needs of victims seeking help. The authoritarian treatment relationship often required in an emergency discourages patient–victims from disclosing their status,51, 120, 138 about which they may be ashamed and confused.

Nevertheless, the ER is arguably the best place for intervention, at least medically informed intervention, in the lives of victims of violence. Battered women often list medical services as their main or preferred source of help.65, 93, 107 Although much domestic abuse occurs within a matrix of personal and social factors that resist change,33, 132 patients in the ED are by definition in a state of crisis. Illness or injury has disrupted their usual patterns of coping and relating, and they can be open to steps they have rejected in the past. The largest factor compelling ED intervention is more mundane: given the way batterers isolate their victims, the ED may be the only setting in which an abused spouse, partner, or child stands a chance of receiving help.20 As the apochryphal gambler explained when asked why he gambled at a casino where he knew the roulette wheel was rigged: “The wheel may be crooked, but it's the only wheel in town.”

Appropriate ED responses to domestic violence require clinicians to have a sophisticated understanding of abusive relationships and the psychological state of victims. This article provides a brief orientation to violent relationships and their medical/psychological consequences. The acronym RADAR (Routinely screen female patients, Ask direct questions, Document your findings, Assess patient safety, Review options and referrals) reminds clinicians of the overall shape of appropriate intervention.66 This article expands mainly on the last two steps of this protocol.

Prochaska's99 model of intentional, clinician-facilitated change in health-related behaviors provides a theoretic framework for responding to victims of domestic violence in the ED. This model emphasizes the need to tailor advice to the patient's degree of readiness to use it. Applied to victims of violence, intervention to promote change must take into account where the woman stands in the process of living with, confronting, escaping, or recovering from a violent relationship. The goal is not to persuade a woman to leave a violent partner, which may not be her best option, but to empower her to improve her safety and well-being.21, 24, 51, 107

Concretely, medical personnel should assess the victim's understanding of the role of violence in her life and especially in her medical condition, with particular emphasis on her current risk for further injury.21, 46 Clinicians should express concern and highlight the medical consequences of problem, if the patient is not already aware of them. Rather than prescribe a course of action, the clinician should then explore the woman's asessment of her choices and resources, offer information to help her revise her assessment if necessary, and determine her current need for or interest in specific medical, social, legal, or advocacy services.51, 98 Consistent with the principles of patient-centered interviewing in primary care90, 116 and of “woman-based advocacy” provided by specialized domestic violence services,33 ED staff must replace neglect or “one-size-fits-all” intervention with a flexible, respectful, and helpful stance toward any victim at any stage of handling the problem.*

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Address reprint requests to Julia B. Frank, MD, Department of Psychiatry AN8411, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20037


© 1999  W. B. Saunders Company. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 17 - N° 3

P. 657-677 - août 1999 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • VIOLENCE DURING PREGNANCY
  • Elizabeth M. Datner, Anthony A. Ferroggiaro
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • VIOLENCE IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING
  • Raymond Lucas

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.