Inhaled mometasone furoate reduces oral prednisone requirements while improving respiratory function and health-related quality of life in patients with severe persistent asthma - 04/09/11
Abstract |
Background: Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in severe persistent asthma has been shown to reduce or eliminate oral corticosteroid (OCS) use while retaining effective asthma control. Objective: We sought to evaluate the ability of mometasone furoate (MF) delivered by means of dry powder inhaler to reduce daily oral prednisone requirements in OCS-dependent patients with severe persistent asthma. Methods: We performed a 12-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial (21 centers, 132 patients) comparing 2 doses of MF (400 and 800 μg administered twice daily) with placebo, followed by a 9-month open-label phase in which 128 patients received treatment with MF. Results: At the endpoint of the double-blind trial, MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily reduced daily OCS requirements by 46.0% and 23.9%, respectively, whereas placebo increased OCS requirements by 164.4% (P < .01). Oral steroids were eliminated in 40%, 37%, and 0% of patients in the MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily and placebo groups, respectively. Pulmonary function and quality of life significantly increased for MF-treated patients. Further reductions in OCS requirements were achieved with long-term MF treatment in the open-label phase. Conclusion: MF inhaled orally as a dry powder is an effective alternative to systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe persistent asthma. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:852-60.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Mometasone furoate, severe persistent asthma, oral corticosteroid–dependent asthma, prednisone, glucocorticoid, health-related quality of life, steroid sparing
Abbreviations : AQLQ, HPA, HRQOL, ICS, MF, OCS, PEF
Plan
Supported by Schering-Plough. |
|
Reprint requests: James E. Fish, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, 1025 Walnut St, Room 805, Philadelphia, PA 19107. |
Vol 106 - N° 5
P. 852-860 - novembre 2000 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?