Thoracic epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia in elective bowel resections - 03/09/11
, Stephen D Helmer, Ph.D a, Patricia W Linhardt, M.D. b, Maurice L Kliewer, M.D. bAbstract |
Background: This study was undertaken to determine if thoracic epidural analgesia is of practical benefit after bowel resection.
Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a thoracic epidural or patient-controlled analgesia for pain control after bowel resection. A standardized postoperative protocol was instituted after surgery.
Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group. Return of bowel function, and interval to discharge was not different between groups. Cost and complication rates were significantly higher in the epidural group.
Conclusions: Although pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group, this did not translate into a quicker return of bowel function or earlier discharge of the patient. Furthermore, the epidural group had a significantly higher complication rate and cost. Therefore, while thoracic epidural analgesia provides superior pain control, it does not offer a significant advantage over patient-controlled analgesia in return of bowel function after bowel resection.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Thoracic epidural, Patient-controlled analgesia, Pain, Gastrointestinal function, Analgesia cost, Bowel resection
Plan
Vol 182 - N° 6
P. 570-577 - décembre 2001 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Burn center management of necrotizing soft-tissue surgical infections in unburned patients
- Lee D Faucher, Stephen E Morris, Linda S Edelman, Jeffrey R Saffle
- Improved patency of infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts using a distal Taylor vein patch
- Kay K Yeung, Joseph L Mills, John D Hughes, Scott S Berman, Andrew T Gentile, Alex Westerband
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?