Evaluating invasive cutaneous melanoma: Is the initial biopsy representative of the final depth? - 29/08/11
Abstract |
Background: An accurate initial biopsy of the deepest portion of the melanoma is vital to the management of patients with melanomas. Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the accuracy of preliminary biopsies performed by a group of predominantly experienced dermatologists (n = 46/72). Methods: A total of 145 cases of cutaneous melanoma were examined retrospectively. We compared Breslow depth on preliminary biopsy with Breslow depth on subsequent excision. Was the initial diagnostic biopsy performed on the deepest part of the melanoma? Results: Of nonexcisional initial shave and punch biopsies, 88% were accurate, with Breslow depth greater than or equal to subsequent excision Breslow depth. Both superficial and deep shave biopsies were more accurate than punch biopsy for melanomas less than 1 mm. Excisional biopsy was found to be the most accurate method of biopsy. Conclusions: Deep shave biopsy is preferable to superficial shave or punch biopsy for thin and intermediate depth (<2 mm) melanomas when an initial sample is taken for diagnosis instead of complete excision. We found that a group of predominantly experienced dermatologists accurately assessed the depth of invasive melanoma by use of a variety of initial biopsy types. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:420-4.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Funding sources: National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO3-AR45033-01, R21-AR48027-01. NIH KO8-AR02082 Career Development Award, and the NIH-funded Skin Disease Research Center (to A. G.). Educational grant from the Ministry of Education, Arab Republic of Egypt (to S. I.). D. B. is an MD-PhD candidate supported by grant 5 T32 HS00059-09 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. |
|
Conflict of interest: None identified. |
|
Reprint requests: Anita C. Gilliam, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-5028. E-mail:acg@po.cwru.edu. |
|
0190-9622/2003/$30.00 + 0 |
Vol 48 - N° 3
P. 420-424 - mars 2003 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?