Laboratory tests and identified diagnoses in patients with physical and chronic urticaria and angioedema: A systematic review - 29/08/11
Correspondence: Martina M. A. Kozel, MD, PhD, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Dermatology, A0-230, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract |
Background: The value of laboratory tests in chronic urticaria is still controversial. Objective: Our aim was to assess this value in clinical studies, and to identify factors explaining the variation in the number of identified causes. Methods: A total of 4 electronic databases were searched, and a manual literature search was performed. Only unselected patient series with more than 50 adult patients were included. From each included study predefined items were recorded to assess their quality (consecutive patients, use of standardized diagnostic criteria) and validity (follow-up, assessment of treatment effects, level of evidence). Results: A total of 29 studies were included, involving 6462 patients. The verification of the validity of the results and the level of evidence of the included studies were limited. Conclusion: No relationship between the number of identified diagnoses and the number of performed laboratory tests, the different settings, the study design, or the publication period was found. On the basis of this systematic review and the relevant literature, a clinical guideline in the form of a flowchart is presented. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:409-16.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Supported by a grant from the Guidelines Development Program of the Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam. |
|
Conflict of interest: None identified. |
|
Reprints not available from authors. |
|
0190-9622/2003/$30.00 + 0 |
Vol 48 - N° 3
P. 409-416 - mars 2003 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?