S'abonner

Hypertensive patients' willingness to participate in placebo-controlled trials: implications for recruitment efficiency - 28/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00507-6 
Scott D Halpern, MD, PhD a, b, c, , Jason H.T Karlawish, MD b, d, e, David Casarett, MD, MA b, d, e, f, Jesse A Berlin, ScD a, c, Raymond R Townsend, MD d, David A Asch, MD, MBA a, b, d, e, f
a Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 
b Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 
c Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 
d Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 
e Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 
f Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 

*Reprint requests: Scott D. Halpern, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 108 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.

Abstract

Background

Underenrollment and selective enrollment plague many clinical trials. Little is known about why hypertensive patients agree or refuse to participate in placebo-controlled trials (PCT) of antihypertensive drugs, whether the prospect of receiving placebo influences willingness to participate (WTP), or whether patients who participate differ from those who do not.

Methods

We described a hypothetical PCT of a new antihypertensive drug to 126 patients who would be eligible for ongoing phase III trials. We solicited patient motivations and concerns regarding trial participation by using open-ended questions, assessed the patients' stated WTP, and used logistic regression to determine patient characteristics associated with WTP. We reassessed WTP in 62 patients after revealing, in random order, that 10%, 30%, and 50% of patients would receive placebo.

Results

The most commonly cited motivations for participating included personal health benefits (40%), helping other patients (37%), and contributing to scientific knowledge (15%). The most common concerns were having to stop current medications (56%), inconvenience/annoyance (38%), fear of known side effects (35%), and the possibility of receiving placebo (24%). Overall, 47% of patients (95% confidence interval, 38% to 56%) were willing to participate. Younger patients (57% versus 37%; P = .01), nonsmokers (50% versus 24%; P = .04), and patients who had participated in research previously (77% versus 20%; P = .009) were all significantly more willing to participate. Fewer patients were willing to participate as the percentage who would receive placebo increased (P = .02), but randomly assigning fully half of patients to placebo still yielded maximal recruitment efficiency.

Conclusions

Hypertensive patients participate in trials for altruistic and personal health reasons. Differences between patients who do or do not participate may influence trial outcomes. The proportion of patients receiving placebo influences some patients' enrollment decisions but is not a key determinant of recruitment efficiency.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Scott Halpern was supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association (Dallas, Tex) and a National Research Service Award in Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Bethesda, Md).


© 2003  Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 146 - N° 6

P. 985-992 - décembre 2003 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Identification, course, and treatment of depression after admission for a cardiac condition: rationale and patient characteristics for the identifying depression as a comorbid condition (IDACC) project
  • Frida Cheok, Geoffrey Schrader, David Banham, Julie Marker, Ann-Louise Hordacre
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of early eptifibatide for non-ST–segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
  • Matthew T Roe, Robert H Christenson, E.Magnus Ohman, Raymond Bahr, Francis M Fesmire, Alan Storrow, Michael Mollod, W.Frank Peacock, Jeffrey A Rosenblatt, Hongqiu Yang, Elizabeth S Fraulo, James W Hoekstra, W.Brian Gibler, EARLY Investigators and Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group (EMCREG)

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.