S'abonner

Problem solving to improve adherence and asthma outcomes in urban adults with moderate or severe asthma: A randomized controlled trial - 28/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.05.010 
Andrea J. Apter, MD, MSc a, b, , Xingmei Wang, MS c, Daniel K. Bogen, MD, PhD d, Cynthia S. Rand, PhD e, Sean McElligott, MS b, Daniel Polsky, PhD b, Rodalyn Gonzalez, BA a, Chantel Priolo, BA a, Bariituu Adam, BA a, Sabrina Geer, BA a, Thomas Ten Have, PhD c,
a Allergy and Immunology Section, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
b Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
c Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
d Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
e Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 

Reprint requests: Andrea J. Apter, MD, MSc, 829 Gates Bldg, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Abstract

Background

Improving inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence should improve asthma outcomes.

Objective

In a randomized controlled trial we tested whether an individualized problem-solving (PS) intervention improves ICS adherence and asthma outcomes.

Methods

Adults with moderate or severe asthma from clinics serving urban neighborhoods were randomized to PS (ie, defining specific barriers to adherence, proposing/weighing solutions, trying the best, assessing, and revising) or standard asthma education (AE) for 3 months and then observed for 3 months. Adherence was monitored electronically. Outcomes included the following: asthma control, FEV1, asthma-related quality of life, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations. In an intention-to-treat-analysis longitudinal models using random effects and regression were used.

Results

Three hundred thirty-three adults were randomized: 49 ± 14 years of age, 72% female, 68% African American, 7% Latino, mean FEV1 of 66% ± 19%, and 103 (31%) with hospitalizations and 172 (52%) with ED visits for asthma in the prior year. There was no difference between groups in overall change in any outcome (P > .20). Mean adherence (61% ± 27%) decreased significantly (P = .0004) over time by 14% and 10% in the AE and PS groups, respectively. Asthma control improved overall by 15% (P = .002). In both groups FEV1 and quality of life improved by 6% (P = .01) and 18% (P < .0001), respectively. However, the improvement in FEV1 only occurred during monitoring but not subsequently after randomization. Rates of ED visits and hospitalizations did not significantly decrease over the study period.

Conclusion

PS was not better than AE in improving adherence or asthma outcomes. However, monitoring ICS use with provision of medications and attention, which was imposed on both groups, was associated with improvement in FEV1 and asthma control.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Asthma, adherence, adults, inner-city asthma, problem solving, health disparities, inhaled corticosteroids

Abbreviations used : AE, AQOL, CES-D, DAL, ED, FVC, ICS, ITT, PS


Plan


 Supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL070392 and HL088469. A.J.A. was supported by HL070392, HL088469, and HL099612. X.W., D.K.B., T.T.H., R.G., C.P., B.A., and S.G. were supported by HL070392 and HL099612. D.P. was supported by HL070392.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: A. J. Apter receives research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and Astra Zeneca/Bristol-Myers Squibb. D. K. Bogen receives research support from the NIH/NHLBI. C. S. Rand is on the advisory board for the Merck Foundation/MCAN and has consultant arrangements with TEVA. D. Polsky has consultant arrangements with GlaxoSmithKline. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.


© 2011  American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 128 - N° 3

P. 516 - septembre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effects of obesity and bariatric surgery on airway hyperresponsiveness, asthma control, and inflammation
  • Anne E. Dixon, Richard E. Pratley, Patrick M. Forgione, David A. Kaminsky, Laurie A. Whittaker-Leclair, Laurianne A. Griffes, Jayanthi Garudathri, Danielle Raymond, Mathew E. Poynter, Janice Y. Bunn, Charles G. Irvin
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • IFNG genotype and sex interact to influence the risk of childhood asthma
  • Dagan A. Loisel, Zheng Tan, Christopher J. Tisler, Michael D. Evans, Ronald E. Gangnon, Daniel J. Jackson, James E. Gern, Robert F. Lemanske, Carole Ober

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.