Advancing asthma care: The glass is only half full! - 28/08/11
Abstract |
Over the past 20 years, there has been a concerted effort in the United States to reduce morbidity related to chronic disease, including asthma. Attention was initially directed toward asthma in response to the recognition that asthma mortality was increasing and that the burden of disease was significant. These efforts to address asthma mortality led to many new initiatives to develop clinical practice guidelines, implement the asthma guidelines into clinical practice, conduct research to fill the gaps in the guidelines, and continuously revise the asthma guidelines as more information became available. An assessment of our progress shows significant accomplishments in relation to reducing asthma mortality and hospitalizations. Consequently, we are now at a crossroads in asthma care. Although we have recognized some remarkable accomplishments in reducing asthma mortality and morbidity, the availability of new tools to monitor disease activity, including biomarkers and epigenetic markers, along with information technology systems to monitor asthma control hold some promise in identifying gaps in disease management. These advances should prompt the evolution of new strategies and new treatments to further reduce disease burden. It now becomes imperative to continue a focus on ways to further reduce the burden of asthma and prevent its onset.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Asthma, childhood asthma, asthma therapy, asthma statistics, asthma management, asthma guidelines, asthma disease management, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting ß-adrenergic agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, omalizumab, asthma surveillance, asthma mortality, asthma hospitalizations, asthma exacerbations, asthma progression, personalized medicine, public health
Abbreviations used : BRFSS, CDC, EPA, ICS, LABA, NACI, NACP, NAEPP, NHLBI
Plan
Supported in part by Public Health Services research grants HR-16048, HL64288, HL 51834, AI-25496, HL081335, and HL075416 and the Colorado Cancer, Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disease Program. Supported in part by Colorado CTSA grant 1 UL1 RR025780 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. J. Szefler is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Schering-Plough and has received research support from the NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Childhood Management Program (CAMP), the NHLBI Childhood Asthma Research and Education (CARE), the NIH/NHLBI Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN), the NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Inner City Asthma Consortium, GlaxoSmithKline, NIH/NHLBI Asthma Net, and a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/US Environmental Protection Agency Childhood Environmental Health Center grant. |
Vol 128 - N° 3
P. 485-494 - septembre 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?