S'abonner

The self-inflating bulb as an esophageal detector device in children weighing more than twenty kilograms: A comparison of two techniques - 26/08/11

Doi : 10.1067/mem.2003.185 
Ghazala Q. Sharieff, MD, Alexander Rodarte, MD, FRCC, Niall Wilton, MD, Patricia D. Silva, MS, Dianne Bleyle, RN, CCRC
Department of Emergency Medicine (Sharieff), the Department of Anesthesiology (Rodarte, Wilton, Bleyle), and the Department of Research (Silva), Children's Hospital and Health Center, San Diego, CA; and the University of San Diego (Sharieff), San Diego, CA. 

Address for correspondence: Ghazala Q. Sharieff, MD, 1500 Marsh Rabbit Way, Orange Park, FL 32003; 904-278-9654.

Abstract

Study objectives: We confirm the ability of the self-inflating bulb to indicate endotracheal tube position in children and determine which method of bulb compression is more accurate. Methods: This single-blind, prospective, single cohort, repeated measures comparison of the on-deflate and the off-deflate methods of bulb compression was conducted in the operating room of a children's hospital. Seventy-five patients weighing more than 20 kg were enrolled. All patients had an endotracheal tube placed in both the trachea and the esophagus, 5 mL/kg of air was insufflated into the stomach, and 4 measurements were obtained on each patient. The bulb was either applied to the endotracheal tube and then compressed (on-deflate method), or compressed before its attachment to the endotracheal tube (off-deflate method). The order in which the methods were utilized was determined by a computer-generated permuted block randomization scheme. The blinded assessor told the anesthesiologist when to start and stop the clock after each intervention. Five seconds was used as the cut-off time for which the clock was stopped. If the bulb reexpanded within 5 seconds, then the tube was considered to be in the trachea; if it did not reexpand, then this was considered to be an esophageal intubation. Results: The mean patient age was 11 years. The on-deflate method had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 92% for detecting tracheal intubations. The off-deflate method had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference between methods: sensitivity −6 to 6, specificity −14 to 0.4). The inaccuracy rate for the off-deflate method was 1%, whereas the inaccuracy rate for the on-deflate method was 5% (Δ4; 95% CI 0.2 to 9). Conclusion: The self-inflating bulb is a reliable method of detecting endotracheal tube position in children. Furthermore, the off-deflate method may be more reliable and accurate than the on-deflate method when used in children weighing more than 20 kg. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:623-629.]

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Reprints not available from the authors.
☆☆ Sponsored by the San Diego American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and the San Diego Children's Hospital and Health Center Trauma Department.
 The authors report they have no financial interest in the product studied or the company that produces it.
★★ Esophageal intubation detectors were supplied by Wolfe Tory Medical, Salt Lake City, UT.


© 2003  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 41 - N° 5

P. 623-629 - mai 2003 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Underuse of analgesia in very young pediatric patients with isolated painful injuries
  • John Alexander, Mariann Manno
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Evaluation of the pediatric risk of admission score in a pediatric emergency department
  • Jocelyn Gravel, Serge Gouin, Devendra Amre, Sylvie Bergeron, Jacques Lacroix

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.