Impact of a surgical oncologist on general surgery residency training program - 25/08/11
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
Abstract |
Background |
To assess the impact of adding a surgical oncologist to our faculty we examined the operative experience in our program before and after the addition.
Methods |
Operative case numbers reported to the American Board of Surgery over a 10-year period were analyzed. This time period encompassed 5 years before and after the addition of a surgical oncologist to our faculty. All defined category case numbers were examined using t test analysis. Significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05.
Results |
The overall caseload increased in the time period after the faculty addition. There was a statistically significant increase in skin/soft tissue, breast, esophagus, small intestine, large intestine, live, spleen, and endocrine cases. No statistical significance was seen in head/neck, stomach, pancreas, and biliary cases.
Conclusions |
The addition of a surgical oncologist to our faculty coincides with a statistically significant increase in areas of skin/soft tissue, breast, esophagus, small intestine, large intestine, liver, spleen, and endocrine. Other areas not statistically significant may reflect referral patterns or this particular oncologist's preferences of practice.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Resident training, Surgical oncology, Caseload
Plan
Vol 187 - N° 1
P. 73-75 - janvier 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?