Visual field attention is reduced by concomitant hands-free conversation on a cellular telephone - 25/08/11
, David Zadok, MD a, Yair Morad, MD a, Isaac Avni, MD aAbstract |
Purpose |
To quantify the central attention-diverting effect of hands-free cellular phone conversation on visual field awareness.
Design |
Experimental study.
Methods |
Twenty male and 21 female healthy participants performed a pretest and baseline Esterman visual field examinations with the Humphrey Systems Visual Field Analyzer II. During the consequent third examination, each participant engaged in a hands-free conversation using a cellular phone. The conversation was the same for all participants. Visual field performance parameters were compared between the second (baseline) examination, and the third (test) examination for each eye.
Results |
During phone conversation, missed points increased from mean 1.0 ± 1.5 to 2.6 ± 3.4 (P ≤ .001) in the right eye and from 1.1 ± 1.53 to 3.0 ± 3.4 (P < .001) in the left eye. Fixation loss increased from mean 7.8% to 27.4% (P < .0001) and from 7.2% to 34.8% (P < .0001) for the right and left eyes, respectively. Test duration increased by a mean of 0.28 seconds (15%) per stimulus (P < .0001). Approximately half of missed points were inside the central 30 degrees. There was no significant difference in the performance of male and female participants.
Conclusion |
We describe a new model for the quantification of the attention-diverting effect of cellular-phone conversation on the visual field. In the current study, cellular hands-free conversation caused some subjects to miss significantly more points, react slower to each stimulus, and perform with reduced precision. Legislative restrictions on concomitant cellular-phone conversation and driving may need to be based on individual performance rather than a general ban on cellular phone usage.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| This work was supported by a grant from the Insurance Research Fund of the Association of Israeli Insurance Companies. |
Vol 138 - N° 3
P. 347-353 - septembre 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
