Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to disease severity - 25/08/11
Abstract |
Purpose |
Inhaled corticosteroids reduce exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their cost-effectiveness is not known.
Methods |
We used a Markov model to determine, from a societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of four treatment strategies involving inhaled corticosteroids: no use regardless of COPD severity; use in all disease stages; use in patients with stage 2 or 3 disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] <50% of predicted); and use in patients with stage 3 disease (FEV1 <35% of predicted). Data from the literature were used to estimate mortality, exacerbation, and disease progression rates, as well as the costs associated with care and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), according to disease stage and use or nonuse of inhaled corticosteroids. A time horizon of 3 years was used.
Results |
Use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with stage 2 or 3 disease was associated with a cost of $17,000 per QALY gained. In stage 3 patients, use resulted in a cost of $11,100 per QALY gained. Providing inhaled corticosteroids to all COPD patients was associated with a less favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. Results were robust to various assumptions in a Monte Carlo simulation.
Conclusion |
In patients with COPD, use of inhaled corticosteroids in those with stage 2 or 3 disease for 3 years results in improved quality-adjusted life expectancy at a cost that is similar to that of other therapies commonly used in clinical practice.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
This project was funded in part by an unrestricted research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, and the Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta. Dr. Sin is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a Population Health Investigator Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Drs. Sin and Jacobs have received honoraria and research funding from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. |
Vol 116 - N° 5
P. 325-331 - mars 2004 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?