S'abonner

Logistic Versus Hierarchical Modeling: An Analysis of a Statewide Inpatient Sample - 24/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.06.423 
Roxana Alexandrescu, MD, MPH , Min-Hua Jen, MS, PhD, Alex Bottle, BSc, MSc, PhD, Brian Jarman, MA, PhD, FRCP, FRCGP, FFPH, FMedSci, Paul Aylin, MB, CHB, FFPH
Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK 

Correspondence address: Roxana Alexandrescu, MD, MPH, Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London EC1A 9LA, UK

Résumé

Background

Although logistic regression is traditionally used to calculate hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR), it ignores the hierarchical structure of the data that can exist within a given database. Hierarchical models allow examination of the effect of data clustering on outcomes.

Study Design

Traditional logistic regression and random intercepts fixed slopes hierarchical models were fitted to a dataset of patients hospitalized between 2005 and 2007 in Massachusetts. We compared the observed to expected (O/E) in-hospital death ratios between the 2 modeling techniques, a restricted HSMR using only those diagnosis models that converged in both methods and a full hybrid HSMR using a combination of the hierarchical diagnosis models when they converge, plus the remaining diagnoses using standard logistic regression models.

Results

We restricted the analysis to the 36 diagnoses accounting for 80% of in-hospital deaths nationally, based on 1,043,813 admissions (59 hospitals). A failure of the hierarchical models to converge in 15 of 36 diagnosis groups hindered full HSMR comparisons. A restricted HSMR, derived from a dataset based on the 21 diagnosis groups that converged (552,933 admissions) showed very high correlation (Pearson r = 0.99). Both traditional logistic regression and hierarchical model identified 12 statistical outliers in common, 7 with high O/E values and 5 with low O/E values. In addition, the multilevel analysis identified 5 additional unique high outliers and 1 additional unique low outlier, and the conventional model identified 2 additional unique low outliers.

Conclusions

Similar results were obtained from the 2 modeling techniques in terms of O/E ratios. However, because a hierarchical model is associated with convergence problems, traditional logistic regression remains our recommended procedure for computing HSMRs.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations and Acronyms : CCS, CL, DNR, HSMR, ICC, O/E


Plan


 Disclosure Information: Dr Alexandrescu is funded by a research grant from Rx Foundation of Cambridge, MA. All authors are members of the Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, which is funded by a research grant from Dr Foster Intelligence, an independent health care information company.
 The Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College is principally funded through a research grant from Dr Foster Intelligence, an independent health care information company (part owned by the UK Department of Health). The Dr Foster Unit at Imperial is affiliated with the Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, which is funded by the National Institute for Health Research. The Department of Primary Care and Public Health is grateful for support from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme.


© 2011  American College of Surgeons. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 213 - N° 3

P. 392-401 - septembre 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Missing Data and Interpretation of Cancer Surgery Outcomes at the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
  • Helen M. Parsons, William G. Henderson, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Michael Davern, Waddah B. Al-Refaie
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Trauma Center Performance Evaluations in a Canadian Trauma System
  • Lynne Moore, Alexis F. Turgeon, Marie-Josée Sirois, Valérie Murat, André Lavoie

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.