S'abonner

Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70291-6 
Frank Berthold, ProfMD a, , Joachim Boos, ProfMD b, Stefan Burdach, ProfMD c, Rudolf Erttmann, ProfMD d, Günter Henze, ProfMD e, Johann Hermann, ProfMD f, Thomas Klingebiel, ProfMD g, Bernhard Kremens, ProfMD h, Freimut H Schilling, MD i, Martin Schrappe, ProfMD j, Thorsten Simon, MD a, Barbara Hero, MD a
a Children’s Hospital and Centre for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 
b Children’s Hospital, University of Münster, Münster, Germany 
c Children’s Hospital Munich, University of Technology, Munich, Germany 
d Children’s Hospital, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 
e Children’s Hospital, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany 
f Children’s Hospital, University of Jena, Jena, Germany 
g Children’s Hospital, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany 
h Children’s Hospital, University of Essen, Essen, Germany 
i Children’s Hospital, Olgahospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany 
j Children’s Hospital, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany 

* Correspondence to: Prof Frank Berthold, Children’s Hospital, University of Cologne, Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924 Köln, Germany

Summary

Background

Myeloablative megatherapy is commonly used to improve the poor outlook of children with high-risk neuroblastoma, yet its role is poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether megatherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation could increase event-free survival and overall survival compared with maintenance chemotherapy.

Methods

295 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (ie, patients with stage 4 disease aged older than 1 year or those with MYCN-amplified tumours and stage 1, 2, 3, or 4S disease or stage 4 disease and <1 year old) were randomly assigned to myeloablative megatherapy (melphalan, etoposide, and carboplatin) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (n=149) or to oral maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (n=146). The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and the number of treatment-related deaths. Analyses were done by intent to treat, as treated, and treated as randomised.

Findings

Intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients allocated megatherapy had increased 3-year event-free survival compared with those allocated maintenance therapy (47% [95% CI 38–55] vs 31% [95% CI 23–39]; hazard ratio 1·404 [95% CI 1·048–1·881], p=0·0221), but did not have significantly increased 3-year overall survival (62% [95% CI 54–70] vs 53% [95% CI 45–62]; 1·329 [0·958–1·843], p=0·0875). Improved 3-year event-free survival and 3-year overall survival were also recorded for patients given megatherapy in the as-treated group (n=212) and in the treated-as-randomised group (n=145). Two patients died from therapy-related complications during induction treatment. No patients given maintenance therapy died from acute treatment-related toxic effects. Five patients given megatherapy died from acute complications related to megatherapy.

Interpretation

Myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation improves the outcome for children with high-risk neuroblastoma despite the raised risk of treatment-associated death.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2005  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 6 - N° 9

P. 649-658 - septembre 2005 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Quality of life?
  • Carolyn Gotay
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial
  • Bryan H Burmeister, B Mark Smithers, Val Gebski, Lara Fitzgerald, R John Simes, Peter Devitt, Stephen Ackland, David C Gotley, David Joseph, Jeremy Millar, John North, Euan T Walpole, James W Denham, for the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG) ‡

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.