The duration of ventricular fibrillation required to produce pulseless electrical activity - 21/08/11
Abstract |
The duration of untreated (no cardiopulmonary resuscitation) ventricular fibrillation (VF) needed to produce postdefibrillation pulseless electrical activity (PEA) was determined in 9 anesthetized swine ranging in weight from 20 to 30 kg. VF was induced electrically by a right ventricular catheter electrode, while arterial pressure and the electrocardiogram were recorded. VF was confirmed by the presence of VF waves in the electrocardiogram and a loss of pulsatile arterial pressure. VF was allowed to persist for 15-second increments (eg, 15, 30, 45, etc), after which defibrillation was achieved with transchest electrodes and the presence or absence of PEA was noted. If PEA was present, rhythmic chest compressions were applied to rescue the animal. Just after initiation of VF and just before defibrillation, VF wave frequency was measured. PEA was encountered in 100% of the trials after 180 seconds of VF. The threshold duration for PEA was 60 seconds. VF wave frequency decreased with the passage of time. At VF initiation, VF wave frequency (f0) ranged from 6 to 15 per second, with a mean of 10.1 ± 2.1 per second. At 180 seconds (f180), the mean frequency was 4.0 ± 0 per second. It was only possible to eliminate PEA and restore pumping in 1 animal when untreated VF lasted more than 180 seconds. There was no clear transition in the frequency of the VF waves with the passage of time that could predict the possibility of postdefibrillation PEA. Moreover, because of the different initial VF wave frequencies and the different rates of decrease with time, a measurement of VF wave frequency is unlikely to be informative on how long VF had been present.
A consistent finding in this swine study of prolonged untreated VF was a rise in blood K+ which increased from a normal prefibrillation value of about 4 mEq/L to 8 to 12 mEq/L at 180 seconds. The longer the duration of VF, the higher the K+.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 23 - N° 2
P. 138-141 - mars 2005 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?