S'abonner

The clinical challenge of bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: An evidence-based comparative review focusing on anticoagulation options in pregnant and nonpregnant patients - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.018 
Niranjan Seshadri, MD a, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD, FACC b, Uri Elkayam, MD, FACC c, Richard A. Grimm, DO, FACC a, James B. Groce, PharmD d, John A. Heit, MD, FACC e, Sarah A. Spinler, PharmD, FCCP f, Alexander G.G. Turpie, MD, FRCP, FRCP(C), FACC g, Gideon Bosker, MD h, Allan L. Klein, MD, FRCP(C), FACC a,
a Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 
b Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiology Division, Boston, Mass 
c University of Southern California School of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles, Calif 
d University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacy, Moses Cone Health System, Greensboro, NC 
e Mayo Clinic, Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hematology, Rochester, Minn 
f University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Administration, Philadelphia, Pa 
g Hamilton Health Sciences General Hospital, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 
h Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, Conn 

 Reprint requests: Allan L. Klein, MD, FRCP(C), FACC, Director, Cardiovascular Imaging Research/Desk F15, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195.

Résumé

Background

Recent labeling changes for enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), have prompted a reexamination of its role in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHVs). Healthcare providers are faced with the challenge of weighing favorable trial results with LMWHs and balancing their clinical experiences with these agents as a bridge to oral anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. This review will provide evidence-based guidance on issues surrounding the use of LMWH that require bridging anticoagulant therapy in the setting of cardiac surgery (MPHVs), cardiovascular disease, and during temporary interruption of oral anticoagulants in patients requiring periprocedural bridging therapy.

Methods

A Medline search was conducted of articles appearing in the medical literature published in English between 1992 and 2004. Approximately 120 clinical trials, case reports, editorials, and/or guideline statements were retrieved and reviewed by the authors as to their relevance for the subject under review, ie, bridging anticoagulation in patients with MPHVs. Approximately 80 of these publications were selected for detailed review, analysis, and discussion in a consensus format.

Results

This review addresses the controversy surrounding the divergence between the new labeling recommending against the use of LMWH in patients with MPHVs as well as the ongoing clinical experience and evidence in the medical literature. The clinical challenges in the use of LMWH and unfractioned heparin (UFH) in pregnant patients with MPHVs are presented; the evidence for LMWHs in nonpregnant patients with prosthetic valves is described; and the role of LMWH for bridging immediately after mechanical valve surgery and its periprocedural and perioperative uses are discussed. Based on an expert consensus panel, clinical algorithms for the use of LMWH in pregnant and nonpregnant patients with MPHVs are also illustrated.

Conclusions

Based on the available data sets, clinical trials, reviews, and registry data, the evidence suggests that LMWH compared to UFH may be a safe and effective agent in patients with MPHVs. Future large-scale, randomized trials are warranted.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2005  Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 150 - N° 1

P. 27-34 - juillet 2005 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • A review of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran : Not yet the end of the warfarin era…
  • Robert Mohapatra, Maichi Tran, Joel M. Gore, Frederick A. Spencer
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Management of risk in peripheral artery disease: Recent therapeutic advances
  • Daniel G. Hackam, Shaun G. Goodman, Sonia S. Anand

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.