S'abonner

Statins and Cancer Risk - 20/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.12.011 
Igor Karp, MD, MPH, PhD a, b, c, Hassan Behlouli, PhD c, Jacques LeLorier, MD, PhD d, Louise Pilote, MD, MPH, PhD c, e, f,
a Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
b Population Health Axis, Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada 
c Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospita, Quebec, Canada 
d Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics Unit, Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada 
e Department of Medicine, McGill University, Quebec, Canada 
f Division of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Louise Pilote, MD, MPH, PhD, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, V Building, Room 2.17, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1.

Abstract

Objective

Despite numerous randomized clinical trials and observational epidemiologic studies, evidence on the potential effectiveness of statins for prevention of cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the relation between lipophilic statin use and cancer occurrence.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study based on a medical administrative database in the province of Quebec, Canada (1998-2004). Patients aged 45 years or more and discharged from the hospital alive after admission for acute myocardial infarction were included. High- and low-dose statin use were defined as a filled prescription, within 3 days after index discharge, at or above (below) the statin-specific target dose, for any of the 4 lipophilic statin medications: atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, or fluvastatin. Statin non-use was defined as non-use of any statins while simultaneously using major non-statin cardiac medications. A total of 30,076 patients, including high-dose statin users (n=6015), low-dose statin users (n=5323), and non-users (n=18,738), were followed for up to 7 years. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate associations between statin dose category and the incidence of admission to hospital with a diagnosis of any type of cancer.

Results

The crude incidence rates of hospital admission with the diagnosis of any type of cancer were 13.9, 17.2, and 26.0 per 1000 person-years in statin high-dose users, low-dose users, and non-users, respectively. The estimated adjusted hazard ratios were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.95) for statin use at high dose and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.75-1.07) for statin use at low dose. No significant time-dependence of the effect of statins at either dose was detected.

Conclusion

The use of lipophilic statins at sufficiently high dose might be associated with a clinically important reduction in the incidence of cancer.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Cohort studies, Drug effects, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, Neoplasms


Plan


 This study was undertaken as part of the Gender and Sex Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease (GENESIS) project, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institutes of Gender and Health and Circulatory and Respiratory Health, and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr Pilote is a research scholar of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and a William Dawson Professor at McGill University. None of the authors have financial interest or conflict with regard to the content discussed in this manuscript. Dr Pilote had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


© 2008  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 121 - N° 4

P. 302-309 - avril 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Sexual Satisfaction and Cardiovascular Disease: The Women’s Health Initiative
  • Jennifer S. McCall-Hosenfeld, Karen M. Freund, Claudine Legault, Sarah A. Jaramillo, Barbara B. Cochrane, JoAnn E. Manson, Nanette K. Wenger, Charles B. Eaton, S. Gene McNeeley, Beatriz L. Rodriguez, Denise Bonds
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Risk of Infection after Nasal Colonization with Staphylococcus Aureus
  • Nasia Safdar, Elisa A. Bradley

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.