Theophylline has been relegated to a second- or even third-line therapy in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), behind glucocorticosteroids and β₂-agonists, although recent findings have suggested that theophylline possesses anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in addition to its well-recognized effects as a bronchodilator. In part, theophylline has fallen out of favor because of its adverse side-effect profile, and this has led to the search for more effective and safer drugs based on the knowledge that theophylline is orally active and that it is a nonselective phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor. This has led to the development of selective PDE4 inhibitors, originally designed for depression, for the treatment of both COPD and asthma. Such drugs have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of respiratory disease while having a considerably safer side-effect profile in comparison with theophylline, particularly because there are no reported drug interactions with PDE4 inhibitors, a feature that complicates the use of theophylline. In addition, it is also becoming increasingly apparent that theophylline is not working solely through PDE inhibition, as formerly assumed, and that this drug has other relevant pharmacologic activities that are likely to contribute to its efficacy, such as adenosine receptor antagonism and induction of histone deacetylase. Thus, the introduction of PDE4 inhibitors represents an entirely new class of drugs for the treatment of respiratory disease.