Through the eyes of women: The partners’ perspective on tadalafil - 20/08/11
Abstract |
Objectives |
To evaluate patient and female partner responses on the efficacy of, and overall satisfaction with, tadalafil to treat erectile dysfunction using sexual encounter profile (SEP) diaries.
Methods |
Data were pooled from four double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials that included 746 couples. Patients were randomized to placebo or tadalafil 10 or 20 mg. Efficacy was evaluated by the mean per-patient/per-partner percentage of “yes” responses to patient SEP questions 1, 2, and 5 and partner SEP questions 1 to 3 (erection achievement, penetration, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience, respectively) for tadalafil versus placebo. For each SEP question, the number of postbaseline intercourse attempts when each couple agreed on the outcome was tabulated and divided by the total number of postbaseline attempts to calculate the mean percentage of agreement by couple. The overall satisfaction with successful postbaseline intercourse attempts was determined.
Results |
Tadalafil significantly improved the responses for the patient and partner-evaluated SEP questions (P <0.001, both doses versus placebo). Partners tended to report greater overall satisfaction than patients at baseline and postbaseline. The mean percentage of agreement by couple was approximately 98% for erection achievement and penetration and 85% for overall satisfaction. For successful intercourse attempts, patients and partners treated with tadalafil reported more overall satisfaction than those treated with placebo (P <0.05, tadalafil versus placebo comparisons).
Conclusions |
Partners reported significantly improved overall sexual satisfaction and corroborated the man’s report of improved erections and penetration ability with tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg. Men reported improved erection achievement, penetration, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience after taking tadalafil.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
This study was supported by Lilly ICOS, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana. S. E. Althof is a consultant to Auxilium and Sanofi Aventis; is a consultant to, study investigator partially funded by, and a member of the speaker’s bureau for, Lilly ICOS; is a consultant to, and study investigator partially funded by, Solvay and Johnson & Johnson; is a consultant to, and a member of the speaker’s bureau for, Pfizer. J. F. Eid is a consultant to, and a member of the speaker’s bureau for, Lilly ICOS; is a member of the Steering Committee of the Consortium for Improvement in Erectile Function, which receives unrestricted educational grants from Lilly ICOS; is a consultant to, and is a member of the speaker’s bureau for, AMS and Mentor; and is a patent inventor for IMS. D. R. Talley and M. E. Dunn are consultants to Lilly ICOS. G. B. Brock is a member of the medical advisory boards, a study investigator partially funded by, and a member of the speaker’s bureau for, Pfizer, Lilly ICOS, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Johnson & Johnson. M. E. Tomlin, F. Natanegara, and S. Ahuja are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and hold stock in Eli Lilly and Company. |
Vol 68 - N° 3
P. 631-635 - septembre 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?