S'abonner

Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study - 18/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.013 
Pamela R. Benitez, M.D. a, , Oscar Streeter, M.D. b, Frank Vicini, M.D. c, Vivek Mehta, M.D. d, Coral Quiet, M.D. e, Robert Kuske, M.D. e, Mary Katherine Hayes, M.D. f, Doug Arthur, M.D. g, Henry Kuerer, M.D. h, Gary Freedman, M.D. j, Martin Keisch, M.D. k, Thomas DiPetrillo, M.D. l, David Khan, M.D. m, Richard Hudes, M.D. n
a Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, 3577 W. 13 Mile Rd., Suite #201, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA 
b Department of Radiation Oncology, USC Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA 
c Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA 
d Department of Radiation Oncology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA 
e Department of Radiation Oncology, Arizona Oncology Services, Scottsdale, AZ, USA 
f Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA 
g Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA 
h Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Institute, Houston, TX, USA 
j Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
k Department of Radiation Oncology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA 
l Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA 
m Department of Radiation Oncology, Daniel Freeman Hospital, Inglewood, CA, USA 
n Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Agnes Healthcare, Baltimore, MD, USA 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-248-551-8890; fax: +1-248-551-8895.

Abstract

Background

This report presents the preliminary results and evaluation of the MammoSite balloon catheter (MammoSite Radiation Therapy System; Cytyc Corporation, Marlboro, MA) as the sole method of delivering partial breast irradiation to the lumpectomy bed with breast-conserving surgery in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods

Twelve institutions are participating in this phase II clinical study. A total of 133 patients have been enrolled and 100 patients have successfully completed the prescribed radiation therapy. A dose of 34 Gy was delivered in 10 fractions over 5 days prescribed to 1 cm from the applicator surface using iridium-192 high-dose rate brachytherapy. Patients who met the following criteria were selected for enrollment into the study: age 45 years or older, unicentric pure DCIS, mammographic lesion of 3 cm or less, negative margins as defined by 1 mm or more, postoperative final gross pathologic size of tumor of 5 cm or less, clinically node negative, and a postlumpectomy mammogram showing the absence of any residual suspicious microcalcifications. The placement of the MammoSite catheter was performed either at the time of the lumpectomy or postlumpectomy. The minimum distance from the balloon surface to the surface of the skin is greater than 5 mm. Data collection points are at time of enrollment, time of implant, 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly at 1- to 5-year follow-up visits. Data collected are local control rates, cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Scale, toxicities, serious adverse events, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and contralateral breast failure. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index scores were calculated for each patient. Local recurrence is defined as either invasive or noninvasive recurrence within the target volume. Ipsilateral elsewhere recurrence is defined as either an invasive or noninvasive recurrence occurring outside of the target volume in the previously treated breast. This recurrence is classified as a new primary tumor.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months (range, 1–24 mo). The MammoSite catheter was explanted for the following reasons: inadequate skin distance (5.1%; 6 of 117), poor cavity conformance (5.1%; 6 of 117), positive margins (2.6%; 3 of 117), final histology (.85%; 1 of 117), and physician decision (.85%; 1 of 117). Of the patients in whom the MammoSite was explanted because of skin spacing or cavity conformance, 50% were at sites of new users (institutions that have placed fewer than 10 Mammosite catheters). Cosmetic results were rated as excellent in 63%, good in 35%, and fair in 2% in the 86 patients with a follow-up visit. Two patients were diagnosed with an ipsilateral local recurrence, 1 outside of the target volume and 1 true recurrence/marginal miss. One patient was diagnosed at 8 months and the other was diagnosed at 11 months. Both of these ipsilateral failures were DCIS. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index of these 2 patients was 9 and 8, respectively. Data collected showed the mean age at placement was 60.8 y, mean tumor size was 10.6 mm, mean actual closest surgical margin was 6.8 mm (range, .1–40 mm), a re-excision rate of 35%, postlumpectomy placement was 71%, and the mean skin-to-balloon surface distance was 13 mm with 89% ≥7 mm. No serious adverse events were reported. The infection rate was 4.0%.

Conclusions

Accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered with the MammoSite balloon was clinically successful in patients entered into a phase II clinical study with pure DCIS, with results comparable with other studies reported in the literature that have evaluated use of the MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for delivery of radiation therapy in early breast cancers. Inadequate skin distance and poor cavity conformance were the main factors limiting the use of the MammoSite device. Cosmetic results were good to excellent in 98%. There have been 2 ipsilateral breast recurrences.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Breast carcinoma, Ductal carcinoma in situ, Partial breast irradiation, MammoSite, Brachytherapy, Breast-conserving therapy, Phase II clinical trial


Plan


© 2006  Excerpta Medica Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 192 - N° 4

P. 427-433 - octobre 2006 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Intraoperative injection of technetium-99m sulfur colloid is effective in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
  • Christine E. Dauphine, Iraj Khalkhali, M. Perla Vargas, Nova M. Isaac, Jason Haukoos, Hernan I. Vargas
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • A novel approach to T classification in tumor-node-metastasis staging of breast cancer
  • Natalie G. Coburn, Emily Clarke-Pearson, Maureen A. Chung, Calvin Law, John Fulton, Blake Cady

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.