Stillbirth risk prediction - 18/08/11
Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.371
Radek Bukowski 1, Gary Hankins 1, Fergal D. Malone 2, T. Flint Porter 3, David Nyberg 4, Christine Comstock 5, Keith Eddleman 6, Susan Gross 7, Lorraine Dugoff 8, Sabrina Craigo 9, Ilan Timor 10, Honor Wolfe 11, Karen Traister 12, Mary D’Alton 13
1 The University of Texas Medical Branch, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galveston, Texas
2 Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
3 University of Utah, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Salt Lake, Utah
4 Swedish Medical Center, Perinatal Medicine, Seattle, Washington
5 William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
6 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, New York, New York
7 Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bronx, New York
8 University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver, Colorado
9 Tufts University, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Boston, Massachusetts
10 New York University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, New York
11 University of North Carolina, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
12 DM-STAT, Medford, Massachusetts
13 Columbia University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, New York
353
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
© 2005
Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 193 - N° 6S
P. S107 - décembre 2005 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Mass spectrometry (MS) - A novel approach in deciphering the origin and duration of intra-amniotic bleeding
- Irina A. Buhimschi, Catalin S. Buhimschi, Guomao Zhao, Christian M. Pettker, Carl P. Weiner
- Comparison of self-reported smoking status and anonymous urinary cotinine testing in pregnancy
- Keisha Bursey-Reddick, Geeta K. Swamy, Rebecca N. Brouwer, Kathryn I. Pollak, Evan R. Myers
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?