Allogeneic blood transfusions explain increased mortality in women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery - 18/08/11
Résumé |
Background |
Postoperative mortality is greater in women than men after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Because allogeneic blood transfusions are more common in women and have been associated with immunomodulation, the impact of transfusion on sex differences in infection and mortality was examined.
Methods |
A cohort study was conducted using Michigan Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Information was used regarding allogeneic blood transfusion, infection, and mortality within the 100-day period after surgery.
Results |
Blood transfusions were more common in women than in men (88.2%, 95% CI 87.1%-89.2% vs 66.7%, 95% CI 65.5%-67.9%). Patients who received transfused blood were more likely to have an infection than patients who did not (14.6%, 95% CI 13.8%-15.5% vs 4.9%, 95% CI 4.1%-5.9%). There was a dose-response relationship between the number of units of whole blood or packed red cells received and the prevalence of infection (P = .035). The unadjusted risk of mortality attributable to female sex was 13.9% (95% CI 8.1%-19.6%), but was no longer statistically significant when adjusted for blood transfusion (population attributable risk 0.6%, 95% CI −6.0% to 6.6%). Patients who received a transfusion were 5.6 times as likely to die within 100 days after surgery as those who did not receive a transfusion (95% CI 3.7-8.6).
Conclusion |
The increased risk of mortality in women after bypass surgery may be explained by transfusion-related immunosuppression.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
This study was supported by AHRQ award P20-HS11540, NIA award K08 AG19180, NIDDK grant 1R21 DK067451-01A1, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Office award RCD-00-006, grant 2002-0013 from The John A. Hartford Foundation, New York, NY, and a Paul Beeson Physician Faculty Scholars in Aging Research award. |
Vol 152 - N° 6
P. 1028-1034 - décembre 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?