S'abonner

COX-2 expression predicts prostate-cancer outcome: analysis of data from the RTOG 92-02 trial - 16/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70280-2 
Li-Yan Khor, MD a, Kyounghwa Bae, PhD b, Alan Pollack, ProfMD a, M Elizabeth H Hammond, ProfMD c, David J Grignon, ProfMD d, Varagur M Venkatesan, ProfMD e, Seth A Rosenthal, MD f, Mark A Ritter, MD g, Howard M Sandler, ProfMD h, Gerald E Hanks, MD a, William U Shipley, ProfMD i, Adam P Dicker, ProfMD j,
a Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
b Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
c Pathology, LDS Hospital, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 
d Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA 
e Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada 
f Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, USA 
g Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 
h Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 
i Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
j Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA 

* Correspondence to: Prof Adam P Dicker, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5097, USA

Summary

Background

COX-2 is overexpressed in some cancers, including prostate cancer; however, little is known about the effect of COX-2 overexpression on outcome in radiation-treated patients with prostate cancer. We aimed to study COX-2 overexpression and outcome in a well-defined cohort of men who received treatment with short-term androgen deprivation (STAD) plus radiotherapy or long-term androgen deprivation (LTAD) plus radiotherapy.

Methods

Men with prostate cancer who had participated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 92-02 trial and for whom sufficient diagnostic tissue was available for immunohistochemical staining and image analysis of COX-2 expression were enrolled in this study. Patients in the 92-02 trial had been randomly assigned to treatment with STAD plus radiotherapy or LTAD plus radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses by Cox proportional hazards models were done to assess whether associations existed between COX-2 staining intensity and the RTOG 92-02 primary endpoints of biochemical failure (assessed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [ASTRO] and Phoenix criteria), local failure, distant metastasis, cause-specific mortality, overall mortality, and any failure.

Findings

586 patients with sufficient diagnostic tissue for immunohistochemical staining and image analysis of COX-2 expression were included in this study. In the multivariate analyses, the intensity of COX-2 staining as a continuous covariate was an independent predictor of distant metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·181 [95% CI 1·077–1·295], p=0·0004); biochemical failure by two definitions (ASTRO HR 1·073 [1·018–1·131], p=0·008; Phoenix HR 1·073 [1·014–1·134], p=0·014); and any failure (HR 1·068 [1·015–1·124], p=0·011). The higher the expression of COX-2, the greater the chance of failure. As a dichotomous covariate, COX-2 overexpression seemed to be most discriminating of outcome for those who received STAD compared with those who received LTAD.

Interpretation

To our knowledge, this is the first study to establish an association of COX-2 expression with outcome in patients with prostate cancer who have had radiotherapy. Increasing COX-2 expression was significantly associated with biochemical failure, distant metastasis, and any failure. COX-2 inhibitors might improve patient response to radiotherapy in those treated with or without androgen deprivation. Our findings suggest that LTAD might overcome the effects of COX-2 overexpression. Therefore, COX-2 expression might be useful in selecting patients who need LTAD.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2007  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 8 - N° 10

P. 912-920 - octobre 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Survival and disease-progression benefits with treatment regimens for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
  • Vassilis Golfinopoulos, Georgia Salanti, Nicholas Pavlidis, John PA Ioannidis
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Management of solid tumours in organ-transplant recipients
  • Thankamma V Ajithkumar, Christine A Parkinson, Andrew Butler, Helen M Hatcher

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.