S'abonner

Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial - 16/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4 
David N Krag, ProfMD a, , Stewart J Anderson, ProfPhD b, Thomas B Julian, ProfMD c, Ann M Brown, ScD b, Seth P Harlow, ProfMD a, Takamaru Ashikaga, ProfPhD a, Donald L Weaver, ProfMD a, Barbara J Miller, MSN c, Lynne M Jalovec, MD d, Thomas G Frazier, ProfMD e, R Dirk Noyes, ProfMD f, André Robidoux, ProfMD g, Hugh MC Scarth, MD h, Denise M Mammolito, MD d, David R McCready, ProfMD i, Eleftherios P Mamounas, MD j, Joseph P Costantino, ProfDrPH b, Norman Wolmark, ProfMD c

for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)

a University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA 
b Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
c Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
d Illinois Oncology Research Association Community Clinical Oncology Program and University of Illinois at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA 
e The Comprehensive Breast Center, The Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA 
f University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Latter Day Saints Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 
g Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada 
h Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada 
i Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
j Aultman Health Foundation, Canton, OH, USA 

* Correspondence to: Prof David N Krag, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05405-0068, USA

Summary

Background

The goals of axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND) are to maximise survival, provide regional control, and stage the patient. However, this technique has substantial side-effects. The purpose of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same therapeutic goals as conventional ALND but with decreased side-effects. The aim of this paper is to report the technical success and accuracy of SLN resection plus ALND versus SLN resection alone.

Methods

5611 women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either SLN resection followed by immediate conventional ALND (n=2807; group 1) or SLN resection without ALND if SLNs were negative on intraoperative cytology and histological examination (n=2804; group 2) in the B-32 trial. Patients in group 2 underwent ALND if no SLNs were identified or if one or more SLNs were positive on intraoperative cytology or subsequent histological examination. Primary endpoints, including survival, regional control, and morbidity, will be reported later. Secondary endpoints are accuracy and technical success and are reported here. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial registry, number NCT00003830.

Findings

Data for technical success were available for 5536 of 5611 patients; 75 declined protocol treatment, had no SLNs removed, or had no SLN resection done. SLNs were successfully removed in 97·2% of patients (5379 of 5536) in both groups combined. Identification of a preincision hot spot was associated with greater SLN removal (98·9% [5072 of 5128]). Only 1·4% (189 of 13171) of SLN specimens were outside of axillary levels I and II. 65·1% (8571 of 13171) of SLN specimens were both radioactive and blue; a small percentage was identified by palpation only (3·9% [515 of 13171]). The overall accuracy of SLN resection in patients in group 1 was 97·1% (2544 of 2619; 95% CI 96·4–97·7), with a false-negative rate of 9·8% (75 of 766; 95% CI 7·8–12·2). Differences in tumour location, type of biopsy, and number of SLNs removed significantly affected the false-negative rate. Allergic reactions related to blue dye occurred in 0·7% (37 of 5588) of patients with data on toxic effects.

Interpretation

The findings reported here indicate excellent balance in clinical patient characteristics between the two randomised groups and that the success of SLN resection was high. These findings are important because the B-32 trial is the only trial of sufficient size to provide definitive information related to the primary outcome measures of survival and regional control. Removal of more than one SLN and avoidance of excisional biopsy are important variables in reducing the false-negative rate.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2007  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 8 - N° 10

P. 881-888 - octobre 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Father of the man
  • Talha Burki
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Expression of choline kinase alpha to predict outcome in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study
  • Ana Ramírez de Molina, Jacinto Sarmentero-Estrada, Cristóbal Belda-Iniesta, Miquel Tarón, Victor Ramírez de Molina, Paloma Cejas, Marcin Skrzypski, David Gallego-Ortega, Javier de Castro, Enrique Casado, Miguel Angel García-Cabezas, Jose Javier Sánchez, Manuel Nistal, Rafael Rosell, Manuel González-Barón, Juan Carlos Lacal

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.