S'abonner

Interactions between heparins, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, and coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) - 16/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.035 
David Brieger a, , Frans Van de Werf b, Álvaro Avezum c, Gilles Montalescot d, Brian M. Kennelly e, Christopher B. Granger f, Shaun G. Goodman g, Omar H. Dabbous h, Giancarlo Agnelli i

for the GRACE Investigators

a Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia 
b Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium 
c Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil 
d University Hospital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France 
e Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA 
f Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 
g Canadian Heart Research Centre and Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
h Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 
i University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy 

Reprint requests: David Brieger, MBBS, PhD, FACC, Concord Hospital, Level 3, Multi Building, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia.

Résumé

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to evaluate hospital mortality and major bleeding rates among patients receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH), or both, and to investigate whether concomitant glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists and coronary intervention affect patterns of use and outcomes with different heparins.

Background

With widespread use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and invasive treatments, patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may have a greater bleeding risk and may not gain additional benefit from LMWHs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate hospital mortality and major bleeding rates among patients receiving LMWH, UFH, or both, and to investigate whether concomitant GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and coronary intervention affect patterns of use and outcomes with different heparins.

Methods

Data were analyzed from 28445 patients with ACS; 21287 had non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina and received LMWH or UFH.

Results

Fifty-one percent of patients received LMWH, 32% UFH, and 17% both. The lowest inhospital mortality and bleeding rates occurred with LMWH (2.7% and 1.8% vs UFH, 4.1% and 2.7%; all P < .0001). After multivariable analysis, LMWH was associated with lower inhospital mortality rates in patients not treated with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, irrespective of whether they had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.94 without PCI vs odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.98 with PCI). Excess bleeding occurred with PCI in LMWH-treated patients. Patients older than 75 years who received GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and any antithrombotic but not PCI had an increased risk of major bleeding (LMWH 14%, UFH 8.3%).

Conclusions

In patients with non–ST-elevation ACS without GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, LMWH was associated with a lower mortality rate and more bleeding episodes in PCI-treated patients than UFH; no differences occurred with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Elderly patients managed medically with GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and either heparin had a very high major bleeding risk.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 GRACE is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from sanofi-aventis, Paris, France, to the Center for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. Sanofi-aventis had no involvement in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.


© 2007  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 153 - N° 6

P. 960-969 - juin 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Preventing tomorrow's sudden cardiac death today : Part II: Translating sudden cardiac death risk assessment strategies into practice and policy
  • Gillian D. Sanders, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Elise Berliner, J. Thomas Bigger, Alfred E. Buxton, Robert M. Califf, Mark Carlson, Anne B. Curtis, Jeptha P. Curtis, Michael Domanski, Eric Fain, Bernard J. Gersh, Michael R. Gold, Jeffrey Goldberger, Ali Haghighi-Mood, Stephen C. Hammill, Joel Harder, Jeffrey Healey, Mark A. Hlatky, Stefan H. Hohnloser, Kerry L. Lee, Daniel B. Mark, Brent Mitchell, Steve Phurrough, Eric Prystowsky, Joseph M. Smith, Norman Stockbridge, Robert Temple, for an expert panel participating in a Duke Center for the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death-sponsored conference
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Sex-specific effects of diabetes on adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Trends over time
  • Kimberly P. Champney, Emir Veledar, Mitchel Klein, Habib Samady, Deborah Anderson, Susmita Parashar, Nanette Wenger, Viola Vaccarino

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.