Late Restenosis Following Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation - 15/08/11
, Simon J. Corbett, PhD a, Gloria Melzi, MD a, b, Rade Babic, MD a, Giuseppe G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, MD c, Flavio Airoldi, MD a, b, Alaide Chieffo, MD b, Giuseppe M. Sangiorgi, MD a, Matteo Montorfano, MD b, Iassen Michev, MD a, b, Mauro Carlino, MD b, Antonio Colombo, MD a, bRésumé |
Despite encouraging results from randomized trials, concerns exist about long-term results of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. We sought to determine whether in-stent restenosis occurring >1 year (“late”) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is a real clinical entity. We analyzed data on all sirolimus-eluting stents implanted in our institution before March 2003. During the study period 928 lesions in 433 patients were treated. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 306 patients (70.6%) with 679 lesions (73.2%). Angiography after 1 year was performed only in symptomatic patients. We considered restenosis “early” if it occurred during the first year and late if after 1 year. Late restenosis required demonstration of a widely patent stent at 6 to 9 months, with repeat angiography after 1 year demonstrating restenosis. Restenosis occurred in 160 lesions overall (23.5%). Of the 31 (4.6%) that were documented after 1 year, 13 were excluded from analysis due to absence of 6- to 9-month angiography; the remaining 18 (2.6%, 1.7 to 4.2) fulfilled our criteria for late restenosis (median time of documentation 607 days, interquartile range 511 to 923). In conclusion, late restenosis is an infrequent but real entity; its existence implies we should not discount the possibility of restenosis as the cause of symptoms that develop >1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 100 - N° 1
P. 41-44 - juillet 2007 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
