S'abonner

Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services - 15/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.031 
Vivian Ho, PhD a, b, , Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS c, d, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH e, Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM f, g, h
a Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX 
b Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine 
c Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 
d Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY 
e Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 
f Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 
g Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Section of Health Policy and Administration, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
h Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 

Reprint requests: Vivian Ho, PhD, Rice University, BIPP—MS 40, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Résumé

Background

Many states enforce Certificate of Need (CON) regulations for cardiac procedures, but little is known about how CON affects utilization. We assessed the association between cardiac CON regulations, availability of revascularization facilities, and revascularization rates.

Methods

We determined when state cardiac CON regulations were active and obtained data for Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old who received coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1989 and 2002. We compared the number of hospitals performing revascularization and patient utilization in states with and without CON regulations, and in states which discontinued CON regulations during 1989 to 2002.

Results

Each year, the per capita number of hospitals performing CABG and PCI was higher in states without CON (3.7 per 100000 elderly for CABG, 4.5 for PCI in 2002), compared with CON states (2.5 for CABG, 3.0 for PCI in 2002). Multivariate regressions that adjusted for market and population characteristics found no difference in CABG utilization rates between states with and without CON (P = .7). However, CON was associated with 19.2% fewer PCIs per 1000 elderly (P = .01), equivalent to 322526 fewer PCIs for 1989 to 2002. Among most states that discontinued CON, the number of hospitals performing PCI rose in the mid 1990s, but there were no consistent trends in the number of hospitals performing CABG or in PCIs or CABGs per capita.

Conclusions

Certificate of Need restricts the number of cardiac facilities, but its effect on utilization rates may vary by procedure.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Dr Ross was a scholar in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at Yale University sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation at times during his involvement in the project.
 Support was given from a grant awarded to Dr Ho by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL073825-01A1).


© 2007  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 154 - N° 4

P. 767-775 - octobre 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Association of ?-adrenoceptor polymorphisms with cardiac autonomic modulation in Japanese males
  • Tetsuro Matsunaga, Koichiro Yasuda, Tetsuya Adachi, Ning Gu, Tsubasa Yamamura, Toshio Moritani, Gozoh Tsujimoto, Kinsuke Tsuda
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Long-term effect of bosentan in adults versus children with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic-to-pulmonary shunt: Does the beneficial effect persist?
  • Rosa Laura E. van Loon, Elke S. Hoendermis, Marielle G.J. Duffels, Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf, Barbara J.M. Mulder, Hans L. Hillege, Rolf M.F. Berger

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.