Targeting Fel d 1 to FcγRI induces a novel variation of the TH2 response in subjects with cat allergy - 15/08/11
Abstract |
Background |
Induction of CD4+ T cells that produce IL-10 or IFN-γ is central to the protective effects of conventional allergen immunotherapy.
Objective |
We examined the T-cell modulatory capacity of a fusion protein (H22–Fel d 1) that targets Fel d 1 to the high-affinity IgG receptor (FcγRI) on antigen-presenting cells.
Methods |
Monocyte-derived dendritic cells pulsed with H22–Fel d 1 were analyzed for surface phenotype and cytokine secretion by flow cytometry and cytometric bead assay, respectively. CD4+ T cells generated after coculture with H22–Fel d 1—pulsed dendritic cells were analyzed at the single-cell level by flow cytometry after intracellular cytokine staining. The T-cell repertoire was compared for subjects with (IgE+) and without cat allergy (IgEnegIgGneg), including subjects with a modified TH2 response (IgEnegIgG+).
Results |
H22–Fel d 1 induced a semimature phenotype in dendritic cells in conjunction with a selective increase in IL-5+ and IL-10+ CD4+ T cells compared with nonreceptor-targeted Fel d 1. Amplified T cells included diverse subtypes characteristic of TH0 (IL-5+IFN-γ+), regulatory TH1 (IL-10+IFN-γ+) and regulatory TH2 (IL-10+IL-5+) cells. T-cell qualitative changes were restricted to subjects with allergy and were distinct from a modified TH2 response. Blocking IL-10 induced by H22–Fel d 1 selectively increased IL-5+ CD4+ T cells, suggesting that TH2 responses were controlled.
Conclusion |
Targeting Fel d 1 to FcγRI induces a novel variation of the TH2 response that incorporates major elements of a protective T-cell response.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : CD64, IL-10, IL-5, IFN-γ, H22–Fel d 1, dendritic cells, CD4+ T cells, regulatory T cells, immunotherapy
Abbreviations used : APC, MCP, MDDC, MIP, TARC
Plan
Supported by National Institutes of Health RO1 grants AI-052196 and AI-020565, and U19 grant AI 070364. |
|
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. D. Chapman owns stock in and is employed by INDOOR Biotechnologies and has received grant support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. J. A. Woodfolk has consulting arrangements with EpiVax Inc and has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest. |
Vol 121 - N° 3
P. 756 - mars 2008 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?