S'abonner

Preferences for cardiac tests and procedures may partially explain sex but not race disparities - 15/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.08.020 
Kevin M. Takakuwa, MD a, , Frances S. Shofer, PhD b, Alexander T. Limkakeng, MD a, Judd E. Hollander, MD b
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5004, USA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 215 955 0915.

Abstract

Objective

There are known race and sex differences in emergent cardiac care. Many feel these differences reflect a bias from the physician. We hypothesized these differences may be the result of patient preferences.

Methods

Emergency department (ED) patients 40 years and older with a chief complaint of chest pain were surveyed from July 11 through December 9, 2005, at 2 academic EDs. This prospective survey study included demographics and prior cardiac test experience. Preferences for hypothetical cardiac tests and procedures were compared between race and sex using χ2 or Fisher exact tests.

Results

Two hundred sixteen patients were enrolled. The mean age was 55 ± 12 years (43% men and 51% black). Blacks compared with whites preferred the electrocardiogram (ECG) to the technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) stress test. Blacks also preferred a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with whites who were more likely to forego PCI. These racial differences disappeared when a physician recommended a procedure. There were no race preferences between PCI vs coronary artery bypass graft, whether or not a doctor recommended the procedure. For sex, there were no preferences between ECG vs MIBI stress test or cardiac catheterization, whether or not a doctor recommended the test or procedure. With regard to a choice between PCI and coronary artery bypass graft, women were more likely to decline the procedure than men. Even with a physician-recommended procedure, women were more likely to refuse than men, whereas men were more likely to accept it.

Conclusions

Blacks were more likely to prefer the less invasive stress test and wanted PCIs more, but these racial differences disappeared when a physician-recommended test was offered. Women were more likely to refuse the most invasive cardiac procedure compared with men. The sex-related preferences might partially explain why women receive fewer invasive cardiac procedures than men. However, race-related cardiac preferences suggest that other factors beyond patient preference account for fewer PCIs in black patients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 An abstract of this manuscript was presented at the annual meeting for the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, CA, May 21, 2006.


© 2008  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 26 - N° 5

P. 545-550 - juin 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Alcohol misuse and report of recent depressive symptoms among ED patients
  • Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, Mohsen Bazargan, Tommie Gaines, Michael Jemanez
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Delayed pneumothorax complicating minor rib fracture after chest trauma
  • Ming-Shian Lu, Yao-Kuang Huang, Yun-Hen Liu, Hui-Ping Liu, Chiung-Lun Kao

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.