Abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular dilator reactivity in pregnancies complicated by normotensive intrauterine growth restriction - 12/08/11
Résumé |
Objective |
Normotensive intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia share a similar placenta pathophysiology, whereas maternal clinical manifestations differ. Clinical symptoms of preeclampsia are partly attributed to vascular endothelial dysfunction, but it is unclear whether this phenomenon plays a role in intrauterine growth restriction. Therefore, we investigated microvascular endothelial function in women with intrauterine growth restriction.
Study Design |
Laser Doppler fluxmetry was used combined with iontophoresis of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, namely, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilators. We studied 12 women with intrauterine growth restriction and 16 controls in the third trimester of pregnancy. All women had prepregnancy body mass indexes < 26.
Results |
Acetylcholine-mediated vasodilatation was significantly increased in women with intrauterine growth restriction compared with controls (743% ± 120% vs 390% ± 67%, P = .01); sodium nitroprusside-mediated vasodilatation was not different (360% ± 55% vs 363% ± 65%, P > .99).
Conclusion |
Nonobese women with normotensive intrauterine growth restriction show abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular vasodilatation, suggesting endothelial dysfunction as in preeclampsia. Obviously, for the clinical manifestation of preeclampsia additional factors are required, and a role of metabolic syndrome and obesity has been suggested.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : abnormal endothelial function, acetylcholine, iontophoresis, microcirculation, normotensive intrauterine growth restriction
Plan
| Cite this article as: Koopmans CM, Blaauw J, van Pampus MG, et al. Abnormal endothelium-dependent microvascular dilator reactivity in pregnancies complicated by normotensive intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:66.e1-66.e6. |
|
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 200 - N° 1
P. 66.e1-66.e6 - janvier 2009 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
