Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation from the use of indoor tanning equipment: Time to ban the tan - 10/08/11
May is Melanoma/Skin Cancer Detection and Prevention Month. In honor of this annual event sponsored by the American Academy of Dermatology, the following article is reprinted from the April 2011 JAAD Online.
Abstract |
The incidence of melanoma skin cancer is increasing rapidly, particularly among young women in the United States. Numerous studies have documented an association between the use of indoor tanning devices and an increased risk of skin cancer, especially in young women. Studies have shown that ultraviolet exposure, even in the absence of erythema or burn, results in DNA damage. Countries and regulatory bodies worldwide have recognized the health risks associated with indoor tanning. In the United States, 32 states have passed legislation to regulate the indoor tanning industry, but there is an urgent need to restrict the use of indoor tanning devices at the federal level. The Food and Drug Administration is currently reviewing the classification of these devices. For all of these reasons, the Food and Drug Administration should prohibit the use of tanning devices by minors and reclassify tanning devices to at least class II to protect the public from the preventable cancers and other adverse effects caused by ultraviolet radiation from indoor tanning.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : basal cell carcinoma, DNA damage, Food and Drug Administration reclassification of indoor tanning devices, immunosuppression, indoor tanning, legislation, melanoma, photoaging, photodermatoses, radiation, regulation, skin cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, ultraviolet, ultraviolet A, ultraviolet B, vitamin D
Abbreviations used : BCC, CDRH, FDA, IARC, SCC, UV
Plan
This article originally appeared in the April 2011 issue of the JAAD online. For citation purposes, please use the following: Lim HW, James WD, Rigel DS, Maloney ME, Spencer JM, Bhushan R. Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation from the use of indoor tanning equipment: Time to ban the tan. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:e51-60. |
|
Funding sources: None. |
|
Disclosure: Dr Lim served as consultant for LaRoche-Posay, Ofagen, and Dow Pharm Sciences, receiving honorarium, and as an investigator for Johnson and Johnson, receiving grants. Dr Rigel served as a consultant and on the Advisory Board for Beiersdorf, receiving honoraria and as consultant, investigator, speaker, and on the Advisory Board for Neutrogena, receiving honoraria. Dr Spencer has been on the Advisory Board for L’Oreal, receiving honoraria. Drs James, Maloney, and Bhushan disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 64 - N° 5
P. 893-902 - mai 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?