Intraobserver variability in grading severity of repeated identical cases of mitral regurgitation - 09/08/11
, Beth Unsworth, BSc, Emily A. Ferenczi, BM, BCh, MA, Justin E. Davies, MBBS, MRCP, Jamil Mayet, MD, FRCP, Darrel P. Francis, MA, MRCPRésumé |
Background |
In clinical practice, mitral regurgitation (MR) is often assessed from the visual impression of the color Doppler image. It is recognized that repeated scanning can give different images and that different observers may grade the same images differently. In this study, we focus on a more intrinsic source of variability—intraobserver variability in grading of identical images, presented more than once at the same sitting. Furthermore, we look for evidence that observer grading is influenced by the severity of the immediately preceding case viewed.
Methods |
Anonymous, 4-chamber color Doppler 2-dimensional video clips of MR were obtained from 60 unselected patients with MR. Six clips were identified by 2 observers as of contentious severity (either between mild and moderate or between moderate and severe). A 72-clip sequence was constructed from the 54 “uncontentious” selected cases of MR intermingled with 3 presentations of each of the 6 “contentious” images. Each contentious image was shown once without a designed order, once preceded by 3 clips of less severe MR, and once preceded by 3 clips of more severe MR.
Results |
Only 1 (8%) of 12 observers gave consistent gradings for the triply presented images. More than 90% (11/12) of the observers reported a different grading of the same clip of MR in at least 1 of the 6 cases. The MR severity was changed in 51.4% of the triplets of identical images shown. Of 12 reporters, 5 (42%) showed classification variability between severe and nonsevere grades in at least 1 of the 6 cases. The direction of change showed no sign of consistency between observers (P = .375).
Conclusion |
Even a skilled observer cannot be relied upon to give an identical grading to an identical simple video clip of MR, when re-presented surreptitiously within a few minutes. Interobserver variability cannot therefore simply be blamed on differential levels of skill. Because, even under these ideal and dramatically simplified conditions, visual assessment is so variable, the future emphasis of echocardiographic MR grading may lie in integrating qualitative analysis with simple quantification methods.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| The authors received support from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Center (London, UK) funding scheme. |
Vol 156 - N° 6
P. 1089-1094 - décembre 2008 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: A randomized, 2 × 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy
- Shamir R. Mehta, Jean-Pierre Bassand, Susan Chrolavicius, Rafael Diaz, Keith A.A. Fox, Christopher B. Granger, Sanjit Jolly, Hans-Jurgen Rupprecht, Petr Widimsky, Salim Yusuf, on behalf of the CURRENT OASIS 7 Steering Committee h
- Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in California, 2003 to 2005
- Zhongmin Li, Khung Keong Yeo, Joseph P. Parker, Geeta Mahendra, J. Nilas Young, Ezra A. Amsterdam
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?