S'abonner

Platelet function following administration of a novel formulation of intravenous diclofenac sodium versus active comparators: a randomized, single dose, crossover study in healthy male volunteers - 07/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.12.011 
Kenneth A. Bauer, MD a : Professor, William Gerson, MD b : Principal Investigator, Curtis Wright, MD, MPH c : Vice President, Jianyuan Wang, PhD c : Biostatistician, Ewan McNicol, MS d : Clinical Trial Consultant, Ryan K. Lanier, PhD c : Clinical Research Scientist, William Kramer, PhD e : Consultant Clinical Pharmacologist, Daniel B. Carr, MD c,  : Chief Medical Officer
a Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 
b Comprehensive Phase One, Miramar, FL 33025, USA 
c Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02140, USA (now Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL, USA) 
d Analgesic Trial Design, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA 
e Kramer Consulting LLC, North Potomac, MD 20878-4352, USA 

Corresponding author. Department of Anesthesia, Tufts Medical Center, Boston MA 02111, USA. Tel.: +1 617 636 9710; fax: +1 617 636 9709.

Abstract

Study Objective

To assess platelet function and safety following single-dose administration of a novel formulation of intravenous (IV) diclofenac sodium (Dyloject) 37.5 mg versus oral diclofenac 50 mg, IV ketorolac 30 mg, and oral acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 325 mg.

Design

Open-label, randomized, single-dose, 4-treatment crossover study.

Setting

Clinical research unit.

Patients

30 healthy, ASA physical status I adult men.

Interventions

Subjects were randomized to one of 6 treatment sequences that included 4 single-dose treatments. Study drug administration occurred on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7.

Measurements

Platelet count, closure time as measured by platelet function analyzer (PFA-100), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and plasma concentrations of the study drugs were obtained over 24 hours after each treatment. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve for PFA collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) closure time difference from 0-6 hours post-drug administration (AUC0-6h). Secondary endpoints included the maximum change from baseline in PFA CEPI closure time.

Main Results

AUC0-6h (mean ± SD) for CEPI closure time difference was significantly smaller after IV diclofenac 37.5 mg (249 ± 216 sec.hrs) than after ketorolac [and ASA (950 ± 287 sec.hrs and 834 ± 237 sec.hrs, respectively); P ≤ 0.0001 for both] but not after the oral diclofenac control (286 ± 265 sec.hrs; P = 0.40). Similarly, the maximum change from baseline in PFA CEPI closure time was lower after IV diclofenac than after ketorolac or ASA across all time intervals examined. There were no significant changes in PT or aPTT at any time point with any treatment. There was a low frequency of adverse events.

Conclusions

Acetylsalicylic acid and ketorolac both substantially disrupted platelet function in contrast to IV diclofenac 37.5 mg or oral diclofenac 50 mg control. Diclofenac, with its balanced COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory profile, may pose less risk of postoperative bleeding than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ketorolac and ASA, which predominantly inhibit COX-1.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Diclofenac, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Postoperative, Platelets, Multimodal, COX-1/COX-2


Plan


 Conflict of Interest: Funding for this study was exclusively provided by Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Javelin). Four authors – Daniel Carr, Ryan Lanier, Jianyuan Wang, and Curtis Wright – are or were employed by Javelin during this study. As Javelin employees, these four authors had financial interest in the subject matter, materials, equipment, or devices discussed in this manuscript. However, the investigators who conducted the study had no financial interests in Javelin beyond reimbursement of the costs of the investigation.


© 2010  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 7

P. 510-518 - novembre 2010 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Does lidocaine more effectively prevent pain upon induction with propofol or etomidate when given preemptively than when mixed with the drug?
  • Margaret F. Brock, Brian E. Grace, Benjamin Morley, Gabe Hillegass, Timothy T. Houle, Leanne Groban
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Retrospective analysis of anesthetic interventions for obese patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery
  • Alexander Butwick, Brendan Carvalho, Christina Danial, Edward Riley

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.