Physical Activity, Disability, and Quality of Life in Older Adults - 05/08/11
Résumé |
This article provides an overview of physical activity and its association with function, disability, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes among older adults. The rationale and the associated onset of chronic disease conditions that influence function, disability, and QOL is embedded in the “Graying of America”. The literature reviewed in this article yielded 3 general conclusions: (1) there is an alarming rate of physical inactivity among older adults, particularly those aging with a disability; (2) there is strong evidence for the beneficial effects of physical activity on impairment, function, and health-related aspects of QOL among older adults, but there is less conclusive evidence for positive effects of physical activity on disability and global QOL; and (3) there is emerging support for self-efficacy as a mediator of the association between physical activity and disability, and QOL outcomes in older adults. Researchers should consider designing and testing programs that incorporate strategies for enhancing self-efficacy along with the promotion of physical activity as a means of preventing disablement and improving QOL among older adults. Such work will go a long way in identifying practical approaches that can be applied for improving the later years of life and is critical because many Americans will soon be affected by the aging of adults in the United States.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Older adults, Aging, Function, Exercise, Well-being
Plan
This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133B080024). The contents of this article do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education and the reader should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. |
|
This article represents an expression of the first author’s training under the mentorship of the second author. Robert W. Motl is responsible for the drafting of the article and Edward McAuley is responsible for the critical review of its content along with the revision of the article. |
Vol 21 - N° 2
P. 299-308 - mai 2010 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?