Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer - 03/08/11
Résumé |
Objective |
The objective of the study was to compare adverse event rates between laparoscopic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Study Design |
This was a retrospective cohort study comparing 107 women who underwent laparoscopy with 269 age- and body mass index–matched women who underwent laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Results |
Adverse event rates were similar between cohorts (37% laparoscopy vs 43% laparotomy, P = .248). Laparotomies had higher rates of cellulitis (16% vs 7%, P = .018) and open wound infection (9% vs 2%, P = .02), whereas laparoscopy had higher rates of sensory peripheral nerve deficit (5% vs 0%, P = .008) and lymphedema (7% vs 1%, P = .003). Laparoscopy was associated with longer mean operating room times but with shorter hospital stays and lower mean blood loss.
Conclusion |
Laparoscopy was associated with decreased rates of surgical site infections but had an increased risk of peripheral sensory nerve deficits and lymphedema when compared with laparotomy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : endometrial cancer, laparoscopy, surgical complications
Plan
Cite this article as: Barnett JC, Havrilesky LJ, Bondurant AE, et al. Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:143.e1-6. |
Vol 205 - N° 2
P. 143.e1-143.e6 - août 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?