Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: A meta-analysis - 09/12/09
, C.B. Hing b, L. Davies c, S.T. Donell a, d
Corresponding author. Tel.: +01603 286595.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Summary |
This systematic review compares the clinical, radiological and kinematic outcomes of fixed compared to mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs). A meta-analysis of pooled mean difference and relative risk data was undertaken following a review of electronic databases. Five studies were identified. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical outcome or complication rate between mobile and fixed bearing UKR. However, the evidence reviewed presented with a number of methodological limitations. Areas for further study are recommended.
Level of evidence |
Level I.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Unicompartmental knee replacement, Fixed, Mobile, Bearing, Meta-analysis
Plan
Vol 95 - N° 8
P. 599-605 - décembre 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Mini-invasive nail versus DHS to fix pertrochanteric fractures: A case-control study
- E. Foulongne, M. Gilleron, X. Roussignol, E. Lenoble, F. Dujardin
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Assessment of the hamstring autograft femoral fixation using the EndoButton CL®
- S. Plaweski, J. Rossi, P. Merloz
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.