S'abonner

Iliac bone-block autograft for posterior shoulder instability - 25/04/09

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.008 
O. Barbier , D. Ollat, J.-P. Marchaland, G. Versier
Orthopedic and Traumatological Surgery Department, hôpital d’instruction des Armées-Bégin, 69, avenue de Paris, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France 

Corresponding author. 21, rue George-Bernard-Shaw, 75015 Paris, France.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Summary

Introduction

Posterior shoulder instability is a rare condition, representing only 4% of all shoulder-joint instabilities. Numerous surgical techniques are used to treat it when conservative functional treatment proves to be insufficient. This retrospective study relates to 8 patients, presenting recurrent posterior shoulder instability, all treated with a posterior iliac bone-block procedure. The results were assessed both clinically and with contemporary imaging techniques.

Materials and methods

A unique identical surgical technique was used in all these cases including a posterior deltoid head detachment, an infraspinatus muscle dissociation and a bone-block positioning intended to extend and enlarge the glenoid cavity rather than to act as an actual block. Seven of these 8 cases were posttraumatic (including 2 with a concomitant congenital hyperlaxity past history) and the non-traumatic 1 was secondary to an epileptic seizure episode. All the patients had a typical posterior shoulder instability clinical presentation in the form of recurrent true dislocation incidents. In 6 cases, imaging revealed lesions of the humeral head or the glenoid cavity. These lesions were displacement-related anterior impaction defects of the humeral head (McLaughlin lesion) and/or a fracture (or erosion) of the posterior glenoid rim. Mean postoperative follow-up was 34 months.

Results

No cases of postoperative suprascapular nerve deficit were observed. All patients recovered normal joint range of motion in abduction and anterior elevation; in 3 patients, however, external rotation ended up being limited by an average 20̊ compared to the opposite side. The mean Constant score was 96.25 points and the mean Duplay score 90. Only 4 patients were able to return to their preoperative sports activity level. Three required an additional procedure, 2 for hardware removal and 1 for posterior deltoid repair, which all lead to an uneventful evolution. Imaging at follow-up (X-ray or CT) did not show any instance of bone-block pseudoarthrosis or osteolysis nor did it exhibit glenohumeral early degenerative changes. In all, at a mean 3years’ follow-up, the present series showed satisfactory results in 80% of cases. A literature review found comparable results for bone-block stabilization procedures. No recurrences of instability are reported with this technique, the main difficulty of which residing in the correct positioning of the bone-block. The stabilizing efficacy and low subsequent arthritic changes of the iliac posterior bone-block graft procedure seem thus confirmed by these encouraging results.

Discussion and conclusion

The iliac posterior shoulder bone-block is effective in managing instances of involuntary posterior shoulder instability. A review of the literature confirmed these satisfactory results in terms of non-recurrence, pain relief and function recovery with this technique; the main difficulties of this technique remains in the correct positioning of the bone-block and the proper orientation of the fixation screws.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Posterior shoulder instability, Bony procedures, Posterior iliac bone-block, Involuntary posterior dislocation


Plan


 Level IV Therapeutic Study.


© 2009  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 95 - N° 2

P. 100-107 - avril 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cross-cultural adaptations of the Oxford-12 HIP score to the French speaking population
  • C. Delaunay, J.-A. Epinette, J. Dawson, D. Murray, B.-M. Jolles
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Results of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable cuff tears
  • L. Nové-Josserand, P. Costa, J.-P. Liotard, J.-F. Safar, G. Walch, S. Zilber

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.