Targeted therapy with a localized abluminal groove low-dose sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer coronary stent in chronic total occlusions: The TARGET CTO non-inferiority randomized trial - 07/04/25

on behalf of the
TARGET CTO Investigatorsa
Highlights |
• | Compared to DP-EES, PCI of CTOs with BP-SES showed noninferiority in terms of late lumen loss at 12-month follow-up. |
• | Despite the nonsignificantly higher J-CTO score was observed in the DP-EES group, it showed no statistical association between J-CTO score and angiographic endpoints except for MLD. |
ABSTRACT |
Background |
Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of a drug-eluting stent featuring an abluminal bioabsorbable sirolimus-containing polymer coating (BP-SES) with an everolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer (DP-EES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs).
Methods |
TARGET CTO is a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial that randomized patients to either BP-SES or DP-EES in a 1:1 fashion following successful CTO re-canalization. The primary endpoint that was powered for noninferiority assessment is in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at 12 months.
Results |
A total of 206 subjects underwent randomization, with 103 assigned to the BP-SES group and 103 to the DP-EES group. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable. The primary endpoint demonstrated noninferiority for the BP-SES group compared to the DP-EES group (0.21 ± 0.43 mm vs 0.21 ± 0.33 mm; P = .934, 2-sided; difference 0.01mm [BP-SES minus DP-EES]; 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.12 mm; p noninferiority < .001,1-sided). No significant differences were observed in secondary angiographic or clinical endpoints. The rates of 12-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis in the BP-SES group and the DP-EES group were similar (6.8% vs 7.5%, P = .86; and 8.1% vs 8.8%; P = .89, respectively). Although there was a trend favoring the BP-SES group, the difference between the BP-SES group and DP-EES group at 12 months in target lesion failure (2.1% vs 8.0%, P = .054) and target lesion revascularization (2.1% vs 7.1%, P = .089) did not reach statistical significance. No definite or probable stent thromboses were reported in either group.
Conclusions |
Compared to DP-EES, PCI of CTOs with BP-SES showed similar results in terms of late loss and binary restenosis at the 12-month follow-up.
Clinical Trial |
ClinictalTrial.gov, number NCT03040934
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 285
P. 93-104 - juillet 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
