Machine Learning Identifies Clinically Distinct Phenotypes in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation - 02/04/25

Abstract |
Background |
Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a prevalent valve disease with a long latent period before symptoms appear. Recent data has suggested the role of novel markers of myocardial overload in assessing onset of decompensation.
Methods |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of unsupervised cluster analyses in identifying different clinical clusters, including clinical status, and a large number of echocardiographic variables including left ventricular volumes, and their associations with mortality. Patients with moderate to severe or greater chronic AR identified using echocardiography at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality censored at aortic valve surgery. Uniform manifold approximation and projection with the k-means algorithm was used to cluster patients using clinical and echocardiographic variables at the time of presentation. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation by chained equations method. A supervised approach trained on the training set was used to find cluster membership in a hold-out validation set. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences in mortality rates among the clusters in both the training and validation sets.
Results |
Three distinct clusters were identified among 1,100 patients (log-rank P for survival < .001). Cluster 1 (n = 337), which included younger males with severe AR but fewer symptoms, showed the best survival at 75.6% (95% CI, 69.5%-82.3%). Cluster 2 (n = 235), including older patients and more females with elevated filling pressures, showed intermediate survival of 64.2% (95% CI, 56.8%-72.5%). Cluster 3 (n = 253), characterized by severe symptomatic AR, demonstrated the lowest survival of 45.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-59.8%) at 5 years. Similar clusters were identified in the internal validation cohort.
Conclusions |
Distinct clusters with variable echocardiographic features and mortality differences exist within patients with chronic moderate to severe or greater AR. Recognizing these clusters can refine individual risk stratification and clinical decision-making after verification in future prospective studies.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Central Illustration |
One thousand one hundred patients were divided into development (n = 825) and validation (n = 275) cohorts. In the development cohort, symptoms, echocardiographic features, and blood pressure were used to phenotype patients into three clusters with unique characteristics and differential all-cause mortality. Cluster 1 included mostly severe but relatively asymptomatic men. Cluster 2 was characterized by older women with the least severe AR and higher filling pressures, and cluster 3 included primarily men with the highest severity (largest EROAs and regurgitant volumes), the highest proportion with reduced EFs, larger LV size, and symptomatic AR.
One thousand one hundred patients were divided into development (n = 825) and validation (n = 275) cohorts. In the development cohort, symptoms, echocardiographic features, and blood pressure were used to phenotype patients into three clusters with unique characteristics and differential all-cause mortality. Cluster 1 included mostly severe but relatively asymptomatic men. Cluster 2 was characterized by older women with the least severe AR and higher filling pressures, and cluster 3 included primarily men with the highest severity (largest EROAs and regurgitant volumes), the highest proportion with reduced EFs, larger LV size, and symptomatic AR. [To note - the cluster and survival analysis data is for representation only. Refer to Figure 1 for study-specific data. Figure created with BioRender].
Central IllustrationOne thousand one hundred patients were divided into development (n = 825) and validation (n = 275) cohorts. In the development cohort, symptoms, echocardiographic features, and blood pressure were used to phenotype patients into three clusters with unique characteristics and differential all-cause mortality. Cluster 1 included mostly severe but relatively asymptomatic men. Cluster 2 was characterized by older women with the least severe AR and higher filling pressures, and cluster 3 included primarily men with the highest severity (largest EROAs and regurgitant volumes), the highest proportion with reduced EFs, larger LV size, and symptomatic AR. [To note - the cluster and survival analysis data is for representation only. Refer to Figure 1 for study-specific data. Figure created with BioRender].Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Highlights |
• | In severe AR, ML identified clusters using clinical and echocardiographic features. |
• | Three clusters differed in demographics, LV remodeling, AR severity, and symptoms. |
• | Mortality increased from cluster 1 to cluster 3. |
Keywords : Aortic regurgitation, Machine learning, Cluster analyses, Echocardiography
Abbreviations : AR, EF, EROA, LV, ML, NYHA, RVSP, UMAP
Plan
| This work was funded by an intramural grant from the Department of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Mayo Clinic. |
|
| Raymond Stainback, MD, served as guest editor for this report. |
Vol 38 - N° 4
P. 300-309 - avril 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
